Friday, February 15, 2013
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Sheriff Joe's B Movie Solution to Real Life Problem
Apparently inspired by the Magnificent Seven, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona thinks the only thing that will stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. So he's started training armed posses. But it turns out that Sheriff Joe doesn't verify that his posse members are actually good guys.
From a story from KPHO in Phoenix:
Arpaio wants his army of 3,000 volunteer posse members to look like sworn deputies and sometimes perform the same duties. But an in-depth project by CBS 5 Investigates uncovered a number of posse members with arrests for assault, drug possession, domestic violence, sex crimes against children, disorderly conduct, impersonating an officer - and the list goes on.Putting guns in the hands of people and deputizing them is serious business. If these people are incompetent or criminal you've only made the problem worse.
It's just a matter of time before one of these loose cannons shoots some cocky teenager who mouths off, drops his gun when he drops his pants and shoots himself or the kid in the next stall, or molests the very children he's supposed to protect.
If we're really serious about putting people with guns in schools to protect children, we can't do it on the cheap. These people have to be trained, vetted and meet the same qualifications as the police. They have to be professionals and not some goof who likes plinking away at tin cans.
To ensure his posse has a solid basis in law enforcement Arpaio hired washed-up B movie action star Steven Seagal to train them. Seagal, who's 60 years old, claims to have put "hundreds of thousands if not millions of hours" into weapons training. A million hours is 114 years.
Apparently Arpaio's standards do not require his trainers to have a basic grasp of arithmetic. Or his trainees to have a clean criminal record.
The sad thing is that when this blows up in Arpaio's face there won't be any stuntmen, squibs and blanks like there are in Seagal's flicks. It'll be real live kids.
And by the way, Sheriff Joe, if you didn't see the Magnificent Seven to the end — spoiler alert — all the good guys with guns get killed.
Yay!
I'm glad I have a 12 year old and a 10 year old with whom to celebrate Valentine's Day so we can join the rest of the children out there in America who place emotional significance on February 14th.
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
SOTU Bite Size Chunks (Part Three)
Here's a segment of the SOTU that won't get much press coverage.
But none of it will matter unless we also equip our citizens with the skills and training to fill those jobs. And that has to start at the earliest possible age.
Study after study shows that the sooner a child begins learning, the better he or she does down the road. But today, fewer than 3 in 10 four year-olds are enrolled in a high-quality preschool program. Most middle-class parents can’t afford a few hundred bucks a week for private preschool. And for poor kids who need help the most, this lack of access to preschool education can shadow them for the rest of their lives.
Tonight, I propose working with states to make high-quality preschool available to every child in America. Every dollar we invest in high-quality early education can save more than seven dollars later on – by boosting graduation rates, reducing teen pregnancy, even reducing violent crime. In states that make it a priority to educate our youngest children, like Georgia or Oklahoma, studies show students grow up more likely to read and do math at grade level, graduate high school, hold a job, and form more stable families of their own. So let’s do what works, and make sure none of our children start the race of life already behind. Let’s give our kids that chance.
It's actually much more than the president is saying. The social cohesion in this country would be vastly strengthened if we started spending more money and time on ECFE. In the long run, it saves us much more money because people that learn the value of an education at a very early age end up being more successful in society.
In short, they become more responsible.
But none of it will matter unless we also equip our citizens with the skills and training to fill those jobs. And that has to start at the earliest possible age.
Study after study shows that the sooner a child begins learning, the better he or she does down the road. But today, fewer than 3 in 10 four year-olds are enrolled in a high-quality preschool program. Most middle-class parents can’t afford a few hundred bucks a week for private preschool. And for poor kids who need help the most, this lack of access to preschool education can shadow them for the rest of their lives.
Tonight, I propose working with states to make high-quality preschool available to every child in America. Every dollar we invest in high-quality early education can save more than seven dollars later on – by boosting graduation rates, reducing teen pregnancy, even reducing violent crime. In states that make it a priority to educate our youngest children, like Georgia or Oklahoma, studies show students grow up more likely to read and do math at grade level, graduate high school, hold a job, and form more stable families of their own. So let’s do what works, and make sure none of our children start the race of life already behind. Let’s give our kids that chance.
It's actually much more than the president is saying. The social cohesion in this country would be vastly strengthened if we started spending more money and time on ECFE. In the long run, it saves us much more money because people that learn the value of an education at a very early age end up being more successful in society.
In short, they become more responsible.
SOTU Bite Size Chunks (Part Two)
This one really struck me.
After shedding jobs for more than 10 years, our manufacturers have added about 500,000 jobs over the past three. Caterpillar is bringing jobs back from Japan. Ford is bringing jobs back from Mexico. After locating plants in other countries like China, Intel is opening its most advanced plant right here at home. And this year, Apple will start making Macs in America again.
Say what? Apple is making Macs in America again? Yes, it is true. That is very good news!
After shedding jobs for more than 10 years, our manufacturers have added about 500,000 jobs over the past three. Caterpillar is bringing jobs back from Japan. Ford is bringing jobs back from Mexico. After locating plants in other countries like China, Intel is opening its most advanced plant right here at home. And this year, Apple will start making Macs in America again.
Say what? Apple is making Macs in America again? Yes, it is true. That is very good news!
SOTU Bite Size Chunks (Part One)
I'm going to be taking the SOTU speech in smaller chunks throughout the day and focusing in on particular passages. First up, is this one...
On Medicare, I’m prepared to enact reforms that will achieve the same amount of health care savings by the beginning of the next decade as the reforms proposed by the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles commission.
Wow. That's certainly going to piss off a lot of Democrats. And it's way past time that he did this!
On Medicare, I’m prepared to enact reforms that will achieve the same amount of health care savings by the beginning of the next decade as the reforms proposed by the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles commission.
Wow. That's certainly going to piss off a lot of Democrats. And it's way past time that he did this!
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Two Responses?
So, Marco Rubio is going to deliver the Republican response to the the presidents SOTU speech tonight. And then Rand Paul is going to deliver the response to that response? Or the response to the president? I'm confused.
It's a good thing the GOP is united and firing on all cylinders these days.
It's a good thing the GOP is united and firing on all cylinders these days.
Monday, February 11, 2013
Not Fake
62-Year-Old With Gun Only One Standing Between Nation And Full-Scale Government Takeover
Bailey, who keeps his gun on his person at all times and regularly patrols his property in his truck, has reportedly struck dread into the very highest-ranking members of the U.S. government. According to sources, top government and military officials are fully aware that they remain unable to commence with their oppressive, systematic subjugation of the American populace as long as the 62-year-old owner of a rifle exists.
I guess The Onion stopped running fake news stories...
Bailey, who keeps his gun on his person at all times and regularly patrols his property in his truck, has reportedly struck dread into the very highest-ranking members of the U.S. government. According to sources, top government and military officials are fully aware that they remain unable to commence with their oppressive, systematic subjugation of the American populace as long as the 62-year-old owner of a rifle exists.
I guess The Onion stopped running fake news stories...
Cashing in on the Ron Paul Name
Now that Paul is retired some of his former supporters are trying to cash in on his name. Literally. Paul has filed a complaint with an arm of the UN to wrest control of the RonPaul.com domain name away from his own fans:
But something odd is definitely going on with RonPaul.com. A check of the whois database indicates that the RonPaul.com domain is registered to JNR Corp, which is located in Ciudad de Panama, Panama (the record was last edited yesterday). RonPaul.org is registered to Martha Roberts, DN Capital, Inc., also in Panama City. If these guys are grassroots American patriots, why the Panamanian shell corporations and the Australian domain registration? What are these guys trying to pull?
A Ron Paul presidency was always a pipe dream. By 2012 he was too old to serve. Paul himself was always too idiosyncratic, outspoken and honest about his real opinions. The great thing about him is that he had something for everyone: he was against the war in Iraq, the UN, the Federal Reserve, abortion and the war on drugs. And he was never afraid of angering his own base. Just last week, after American sniper Chris Kyle was killed at a gun range, Paul tweeted:
If the RonPaul.com guys really were Paul supporters, you'd think they would gladly give up the domain names to the guy that they respected and admired so much. The idea of Ron Paul as president was always just a lark, and a fun time was had by all. Let it go. But instead they're trying to extort him out of a quarter million bucks.
This is not a betrayal by Ron Paul. He owes these people nothing. For years they've been cashing in Paul's cult of personality, and now that his star is setting they're looking at declining influence — and revenues. The only thing more pitiful than a has-been celebrity are a has-been celebrity's sycophants. This is their last-gasp attempt to gouge Paul for a few dollars more.
People on the right are constantly yapping about god and county and tradition and principles and rights, but at the end of the day it's always about the money.
And I still can't stop laughing that Ron Paul is going all UN his supporters' ass.
The authors of RonPaul.com see the move as the ultimate betrayal from a politician who, more than many others, depended on an astounding level of grassroots support on the Internet in order to keep his longshot presidential campaigns running.It's a little ironic that the famously isolationist libertarian would go to the World Intellectual Property Organization to resolve a tiff with his supporters. But Ron Paul is completely within his rights to demand this domain name. WIPO is how such disputes are resolved. The guys at RonPaul.com are at best bitter disillusioned diehards, and at worst cybersquatters or extortionists.
"Last month, after Ron Paul expressed regret on the Alex Jones show over not owning RonPaul.com (in an interview titled "Ron Paul: The Internet Is Our Last Chance to Awaken America"), dozens of supporters urged us to contact Ron Paul to work out a deal," the owners of RonPaul.com write.
They say they offered Paul the use of RonPaul.org as a "free gift" but wanted to keep RonPaul.com. Their price, should Paul really want RonPaul.com, was $250,000.
But something odd is definitely going on with RonPaul.com. A check of the whois database indicates that the RonPaul.com domain is registered to JNR Corp, which is located in Ciudad de Panama, Panama (the record was last edited yesterday). RonPaul.org is registered to Martha Roberts, DN Capital, Inc., also in Panama City. If these guys are grassroots American patriots, why the Panamanian shell corporations and the Australian domain registration? What are these guys trying to pull?
A Ron Paul presidency was always a pipe dream. By 2012 he was too old to serve. Paul himself was always too idiosyncratic, outspoken and honest about his real opinions. The great thing about him is that he had something for everyone: he was against the war in Iraq, the UN, the Federal Reserve, abortion and the war on drugs. And he was never afraid of angering his own base. Just last week, after American sniper Chris Kyle was killed at a gun range, Paul tweeted:
Chris Kyle's death seems to confirm that "he who lives by the sword dies by the sword." Treating PTSD at a firing range doesn't make sense.In short, Ron Paul has enough baggage to sink the Titanic even if it had missed the iceberg.
If the RonPaul.com guys really were Paul supporters, you'd think they would gladly give up the domain names to the guy that they respected and admired so much. The idea of Ron Paul as president was always just a lark, and a fun time was had by all. Let it go. But instead they're trying to extort him out of a quarter million bucks.
This is not a betrayal by Ron Paul. He owes these people nothing. For years they've been cashing in Paul's cult of personality, and now that his star is setting they're looking at declining influence — and revenues. The only thing more pitiful than a has-been celebrity are a has-been celebrity's sycophants. This is their last-gasp attempt to gouge Paul for a few dollars more.
People on the right are constantly yapping about god and county and tradition and principles and rights, but at the end of the day it's always about the money.
And I still can't stop laughing that Ron Paul is going all UN his supporters' ass.
Best Picture: Les Miserables
I'm not much for musicals but Tom Hooper's Les Miserables is absolutely stunning. All of the actors are dazzling. Who knew that Russell Crowe could sing?
Anne Hathaway completely gives every iota of her heart and soul to her portrayal of Fantine and I have to admit I was moved to tears by her performance. It was devastating.
I remember how I rolled my eyes when I saw the trailer and thinking, "Again, with this story?" Boy, was I wrong!
Anne Hathaway completely gives every iota of her heart and soul to her portrayal of Fantine and I have to admit I was moved to tears by her performance. It was devastating.
I remember how I rolled my eyes when I saw the trailer and thinking, "Again, with this story?" Boy, was I wrong!
Sunday, February 10, 2013
Good Words
The party right now is a holding company that's devoid of a soul and it will be filled up with ideas over time and leaders will take their proper place. We can't be known as a party that's fear-based and doesn't believe in math. In the end it will come down to a party that believes in opportunity for all our people, economic competitiveness and a strong dose of libertarianism
--(former Utah Governor, Ambassador to China and GOP presidential candidate Jon Huntsman)
Agreed. But how long will it take to clear out the clown car?
--(former Utah Governor, Ambassador to China and GOP presidential candidate Jon Huntsman)
Agreed. But how long will it take to clear out the clown car?
Saturday, February 09, 2013
A Perpetual Adolescent Power Fantasy
Bill requires all Idaho kids to read ‘Atlas Shrugged’
Fantastic! Now, it will be a law that young people have an indefinite adolescent power fantasy.
And doesn't this subvert the whole point of the book? Like I have been saying....most libertarians are closet fascists. Re-education camps are fine as long as we are doing it!
Fantastic! Now, it will be a law that young people have an indefinite adolescent power fantasy.
And doesn't this subvert the whole point of the book? Like I have been saying....most libertarians are closet fascists. Re-education camps are fine as long as we are doing it!
Best Picture: Django Unchained
I have no earthly idea why Quentin Tarrentino's Django Unchained was nominated for Best Picture. It's a good film and is very typical Tarrentino but certainly not as strong as Inglorious Bastards. Definitely not Oscar level material. Christopher Waltz shines once again, this time as a bounty hunter who rescues Django, played by Jamie Foxx, from slavery. The two end up teaming up, making money, and going after Django's wife who is still a slave.
Along the way, they shoot a lot of bigots with giant amounts of blood spurting out from every imaginable orifice. The acting is very good. Who can go wrong with Leonardo DiCaprio and Samuel Jackson? The violence is way over the top but not nearly as bad as Bastards or Reservoir Dogs. I was cautioned by many of my friends that it was "really, really violent." Had they ever seen a Quentin Tarrentino film before? Probably just the usual over sensitivity that seems to get worse and worse every day in our culture.
If you like revenge flicks and some serious gun play, this is the film for you.
Along the way, they shoot a lot of bigots with giant amounts of blood spurting out from every imaginable orifice. The acting is very good. Who can go wrong with Leonardo DiCaprio and Samuel Jackson? The violence is way over the top but not nearly as bad as Bastards or Reservoir Dogs. I was cautioned by many of my friends that it was "really, really violent." Had they ever seen a Quentin Tarrentino film before? Probably just the usual over sensitivity that seems to get worse and worse every day in our culture.
If you like revenge flicks and some serious gun play, this is the film for you.
Friday, February 08, 2013
There Was Nothing Free About Them
If only people were allowed to carry their guns wherever they felt like it, spree shootings would never happen, gun free zone detractors whine in typical adolescent fashion. It continually amazes me that the core of their argument about this and many other issues revolves around the same basic emotion: I wanna do what I wanna do when I wanna do it and if I don't get my way, bad things will happen. See?!! Told ya!! Fuck you, dad!! (stomp stomp stomp...SLAM!)
Setting aside this perpetual, childish outburst, the assertion that spree shootings are more lethal because they are in gun free zones is patently false. The idea that we can somehow get into the mind of these people and (ahem) reason that they pick these places so they can have the largest body count is one of the finest examples of projection and confirmation bias I have ever witnessed. You would think that they were presenting a conclusion to an argument without having any facts to support it. That couldn't possibly be true!
When Cookie Thornton shot up Kirkwood City Hall, he began his spree by shooting a police officer, taking his gun, and then heading inside to continue his path of destruction. The fact that there were guns in the building had no effect on Thornton's mindset. He went in anyway. Thornton, by the way, was yet another individual with a pathological hatred for government. Jared Loughner walked in to a parking lot that was not a gun free zone and had no compunction about shooting up the joint. People were allowed to carry arms around that area and that certainly didn't stop him. Chris Kyle was a Navy SEAL and heavily armed and trained, when he was shot, along with his friend Chad Littlefield, at a gun range (see: not gun free) by Eddie Ray Routh.
And armed security was present at Columbine when Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold went on their rampage, killing 12 people.
So, this notion that getting rid of gun free zones will somehow be a panacea is ludicrous. The above are just a few examples. Whether guns are present or not present has no bearing on whether or not people go on shooting sprees. It's simply another in a nauseating series of proclamations by children who are trying to get their own way.
Setting aside this perpetual, childish outburst, the assertion that spree shootings are more lethal because they are in gun free zones is patently false. The idea that we can somehow get into the mind of these people and (ahem) reason that they pick these places so they can have the largest body count is one of the finest examples of projection and confirmation bias I have ever witnessed. You would think that they were presenting a conclusion to an argument without having any facts to support it. That couldn't possibly be true!
When Cookie Thornton shot up Kirkwood City Hall, he began his spree by shooting a police officer, taking his gun, and then heading inside to continue his path of destruction. The fact that there were guns in the building had no effect on Thornton's mindset. He went in anyway. Thornton, by the way, was yet another individual with a pathological hatred for government. Jared Loughner walked in to a parking lot that was not a gun free zone and had no compunction about shooting up the joint. People were allowed to carry arms around that area and that certainly didn't stop him. Chris Kyle was a Navy SEAL and heavily armed and trained, when he was shot, along with his friend Chad Littlefield, at a gun range (see: not gun free) by Eddie Ray Routh.
And armed security was present at Columbine when Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold went on their rampage, killing 12 people.
So, this notion that getting rid of gun free zones will somehow be a panacea is ludicrous. The above are just a few examples. Whether guns are present or not present has no bearing on whether or not people go on shooting sprees. It's simply another in a nauseating series of proclamations by children who are trying to get their own way.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)