This Is Exactly Why Women Don't Report Sex Crimes

Women have historically been extremely hesitant to report sexual harassment because they will be called liars, the abuser's pals will say they did nothing wrong, and the victims will be threatened with physical, financial and legal retribution.

Just look at Alabama:

Republican officials in Alabama staunchly defended their party’s Senate nominee, Roy S. Moore, after a report that he had made sexual advances toward four teenage girls when he was in his 30s.

The Washington Post reported that, in early 1979, Mr. Moore, then a district attorney and later the chief justice of the state Supreme Court, had approached a 14-year-old, eventually kissing her, undressing her, touching her over her bra and underpants, and guiding her hand to touch him over his underwear.

Moore claims that there's nothing to the women's allegations. Some Republicans basically admitted that Moore was guilty, but didn't care or think it was wrong, and some even played the Bible card:

Alabama’s state auditor, Jim Ziegler, told The Washington Examiner that the women’s claims were “much ado about nothing” and said that Mr. Moore had done nothing “immoral or illegal.” (Alabama law, both in 1979 and now, finds that someone who is 19 or older and has sexual contact with someone between the ages of 12 and 16 is guilty of second-degree sex abuse.)

Mr. Ziegler sought to justify Mr. Moore’s actions by comparing him to the biblical Joseph, saying, “Mary was a teenager and Joseph was an adult carpenter. They became parents of Jesus.” 

According to this line of reasoning, it's okay for a 32-year-old man to cop a feel from a 14-year-old girl because Jesus.

Then the Pizzagate conspiracist, Jack Posobiec, published a photo and the address of Moore's accuser online. As you may recall, Posobiec inspired a nut with a gun to shoot up a pizza joint. Now he has threatened Moore's victim with similar attacks.

And then there was this was scumbag:

Ed Henry, a state representative, told The Cullman Times, in Cullman County, Ala., that the women who came forward should be subject to legal action.

“If they believe this man is predatory, they are guilty of allowing him to exist for 40 years,” he said. “I think someone should prosecute and go after them. You can’t be a victim 40 years later, in my opinion.”

This weasel is blaming the victim for the crimes of a powerful sexual predator -- Moore was a DA in 1979 -- and then threatening to use the court system to attack and silence her. And then they wonder why women wait 40 years to report the assault.

At least guys like Louis C.K. have the guts to admit what they did was wrong and apologize for it. But Moore doesn't think he did anything wrong; he thinks he owns girls and women and can do anything he wants with their bodies. He can kiss them, fondle them, take away their birth and control and stop them from having abortions for pregnancies caused by unwanted intercourse with older men.

This is the same hypocrite who put the 10 commandments on the wall of his courtroom and on state property, pretending to be all holier than thou.

Moore is an unrepentant animal who preyed on young girls. We should not be surprised. Moore was the lone dissenter in the 2015 conviction of a 17-year-old daycare worker who sexually assaulted 3- to 5-year-olds.

The kid was just following in Moore's footsteps, after all.

Eewww!

Every day now there's another truckload of sexual harassment allegations committed by rich, powerful and famous men. Yesterday it was Louis C. K., a comedian, and Roy Moore, a former Alabama supreme court justice who was kicked off the bench twice and is currently running for U.S. Senate.

One of the most puzzling aspects of these harassment episodes is the allegation that these men, including Harvey Weinstein and Louis C.K., masturbate in front of women.

There are only two possible reactions to a man masturbating in front of a woman: "Eewww! Gross!" and "Eewww! That's disgusting!"

I know that some men like watching pornography in which beautiful women touch themselves. But I can assure them that the attraction is not reciprocal: no woman in the world is stimulated by the sight of a fat, balding, middle-aged man jerking off.

In the English-speaking world there are many synonyms for "loser:" many of them are variations on a theme: jerk-off, wanker, tosser, to name a few. And the archetypal biggest loser ever is the guy running around in a trench coat exposing himself to little girls.

Why do these idiots think that losing the trench coat makes it attractive?

Too Soon!

Could Alabama Turn Blue On December 12?

Alabama is holding a special election on December 12 to fill the seat vacated by Jeff Sessions when he became Attorney General. The GOP candidate is Roy Moore. Moore was recently installed at the Bannon pick to fuck with the establishment in DC. Moore is classic wingnut who loves to brandish his gun at rallies.

Oh, and he's also a pedophile.

Doug Jones is the Democratic candidate running against Moore. Here is what he stands for straight from his home page.

• Everyone has the right to quality, affordable health care.
• We must restore Alabama’s trust for its elected leaders.
• I will defend a woman’s right to choose and stand with Planned Parenthood.
• All children deserve a first-class education regardless of where they live.
• College must be affordable without burdening a student with overwhelming debt.
• I believe in science and will work to slow or reverse the impact of climate change.
• It is past time we raise the minimum wage to a livable wage.
• Women must be paid an equal wage for equal work at all levels.
• Voter suppression is unAmerican – we must protect voting rights.
• Discrimination cannot be tolerated or protected. America is best when it builds on diversity and is welcoming of the contributions of all.

He's not even trying to be more moderate. He's just straight up going for it in a deep red state. I fucking love it.

If the Democrats manage to flip this seat, all bets are off next year. If they don't, the Republicans will have shown themselves to more morally bankrupt that I thought possible.

Ah well, better a pedophile than a libtard, eh?

An OK Night For The Democrats

Much hay is being made by the Democrats over their election wins last Tuesday night. There's a lot of headlines and stories about how much trouble Trump and the GOP are in blah blah blah. I think it was just an OK night for Team Blue. Why?

Trump still enjoys an 80 percent approval rating among conservatives. They are still the more reliable voter than liberals. That's why all this talk about Trump's sinking approval rating doesn't really matter. All of those polls suck except one: the Rasmussen poll. Take a look at the approve-disapprove as of today. Rasmussen is the only one that samples likely voters. That's why Trump is only underwater by 13 points. The likely voter skews more conservative.

If the Democrats want to crow up about something, they need to figure out a way to shift the likely voter more to the left and that means more people out to vote. The only thing conservatives have going for them is that their voters are more reliable. They don't have the numbers and they certainly don't have the solutions.

Here We Go Again

Every time there's a mass shooting, some idiot Republican trots out the same old tired lies, the most egregious of which is the "good guys with guns" nonsense. This time it was Trump:

"But, this isn't a guns situation, we could go into it, but it's a little soon to go into it," said Mr. Trump. "Fortunately somebody else had a gun that was shooting in the opposite direction.

This is -- like 90% of what Trump says -- just plain false. According to local law enforcement:

Sheriff Tackitt said he believed the gunman went around the outside of the church firing rounds before entering and shooting at parishioners. After he left the church, he and an armed bystander engaged in a brief “firefight” before Mr. Kelley got into his vehicle, according to the sheriff. The gunman had dropped his rifle in the church after slaughtering the parishioners; he pulled a pistol during his exchange with the bystander.

Mr. Kelley contacted his father from his cellphone during the chase to tell him that he had been shot, according to law enforcement. Mr. Kelley told his father that he “didn’t think he was going to make it.” He subsequently shot himself, though officials said they were not yet sure if that shot had caused his death.

The murderer had already killed his victims, abandoned the murder weapon and left the scene. He was shot at by a bystander, who gave chase. But the killer died by his own hand. A good guy with a gun did not end this situation: the guy stopped killing, left, then shot himself.

Once again, guns are not protection. They can only deliver retribution after the killer has shot and killed 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50 or 100 people. The number of dead is a function of the firing rate of the weapon, its magazine capacity and the real protection the shooter has -- body armor in this case, or the inaccessible firing position of the Vegas shooter.

A clear pattern is developing. These mass murderers are angry white male domestic abusers and gun idolators. The church the Texas killer shot up was where his wife's parents worshiped.

But in a broader context mass murderers are almost always angry, narcissistic, vengeful misogynists, whether they are Muslim truck terrorists, high-school shooters, college shooters or church shooters.

Trump said, "But this isn’t a guns situation. This is a mental health problem at the highest level."

Actually it was a "guns situation" because the guy shot 50 people with a gun. But Trump is right about the last part. This is a mental health problem at the highest level: the presidential level.

Trump shares the same profile as these mass murderers: an angry, narcissistic, vengeful misogynist.

It's no coincidence that we setting records for mass murder under Donald Trump and the Republicans. He and the Republican Party have pushed grievance politics for years, egging the base on to "take back" the country. Trump brags about how he always gets revenge, hitting back 10 times harder than those who cross him. Trump regularly demeans and attacks women.

Trump has no empathy, no sympathy, no self control. Every day he practices verbal mass murder on Twitter and at his press conferences. He does not apologize -- he gets even. His tirades greenlight people who harbor grievances to get their revenge.

Trump and the right constantly rail against "political correctness." They want to freely insult women, gays and minorities, take liberties with women's bodies, beat up gays and Hispanics, and use their political and economic power to intimidate and disadvantage women, gays and minorities. All in an effort to "restore" America to the way used to be: with white men on top, able to get their way every time, taking whatever they want.

"Political correctness" is just a synonym for civil society and the Golden Rule: do unto others as you would have them do unto you. By throwing out social norms of conduct, Trump is normalizing narcissism and psychopathy.

And opening the door to endless carnage in our streets, at our concerts, schools and churches.

Thank You, Gun Cult and Steve Bannon!

When an enemy reveals their strategy to you, listen.

Steve Bannon, in his interview with the American Prospect.

“The Democrats,” he said, “the longer they talk about identity politics, I got ’em. I want them to talk about racism every day. If the left is focused on race and identity, and we go with economic nationalism, we can crush the Democrats.”

Kevin Baker, Gun Blogger. recently on Quora.

Ok, one more time: the "gun manufacturer's lobby" is the National Shooting Sports Foundation. The NRA represents ~5 million dues-paying members and probably double that, if not more, in other citizens who aren't members, but who VOTE.

Bloomberg's millions of gun-control dollars (greed) have not and will not overcome millions of voters. Why is it that Democrats only seem to like democracy when the vote goes their way? As the saying goes, after every incidence of 'gun violence' they always want to take the rights of the people who DIDN'T do it. Well, we VOTE. WE vote, not the NRA.

So, if the Democrats change how they talk about racism and identity politics in similar way to how the LGBTQ community won (gay marriage becomes marriage equality), Bannon won't "have 'em" anymore. Thanks for the reveal, Steve!

And, if the gun safety folks get more people to vote, then they win too? Right now about 11 percent of the voting public wants to ban guns. That's over 20 million people. Compare that to the mere 5 million people in the NRA. Forget about Bloomberg's millions. More voters is all we really need. Thanks, Kevin!

Trump's Justice

I think if Donald Trump had his way, the Department of Justice would be comprised of his own personal agents. His recent comments about the NYC attack and past comments about the Russian investigation reveal what I have always believed about him and his supporters.

They are closet fascists.

They essentially want to be able to act without consequence and those smug, liberal elites getting in the way. They know what's right and it's definitely not any of that liberal claptrap.

I'm wondering if they realize just how much of deep violation this is of the US Constitution. Do they really want us to become a banana republic?

@realDonaldTrump does not exist

Donald Trump's Twitter account disappeared for several minutes yesterday. Sadly, it didn't mean that Trump had deleted it. No: a Twitter customer support worker deactivated it on his last day at work.

Some of Trump's apologists thought Trump was being censored and instantly started screaming "Freedom of speech! Freedom of speech!"

Sorry. It's Donald Trump who doesn't believe in freedom of speech: he has blocked numerous people from his Twitter feed, including Stephen King, Marina Sirtis, and VoteVets.org.

Does freedom of speech even apply to Twitter? They set the terms of usage. Twitter has a code of conduct and has banned numerous people for threatening physical violence, cyberstalking, cyberbullying and other forms of harassment.

But they claim the right to revoke anyone's account at their discretion. They're a private company. Providing a free service. What possible right can anyone claim to use the resources of a private company?

Donald Trump has violated Twitter's code of conduct numerous times, including threats of nuclear war against North Korea. If there's one person whose Twitter account should be deleted, it's Trump: he is the biggest bully on the planet.

What this incident really shows is that your accounts on Facebook, Twitter, Google, Microsoft, Apple and all the others are completely insecure in the most meaningful sense. Any low-level support person can go in and muck around with your data. Look at your pictures. Read your emails. Delete them. Copy them. Forward them to your wife.

This is of necessity: to provide fast service to resolve problems, a large number of support personnel need access to your accounts. But who are these support personnel? Most are poorly paid phone operators with minimal understanding of the systems they work with. We don't know how they're vetted, how they're trained, how they're monitored. We don't even know what country they work in: many IT support functions are contracted out to giant phone banks in India and the Philippines.

But we trust them with all our data, our deepest secrets.

It's clear that Twitter has no safeguards to stop disgruntled employees from screwing around with your Twitter account. The same thing is almost certainly true for Facebook and Google: thousands of support personnel, programmers, system operators and database administrators have total access to your data. And they need access to do their jobs and provide efficient service.

We are all being conned into putting all our data in "the cloud" so we can always have access to it. The problem is, everyone else has access to it too.

More Domestic Terrorism at a Denver Walmart

Police have released more information after capturing the man who shot three people in a Denver Walmart:

Two men and a woman were killed in a shooting inside a suburban Denver Walmart on Wednesday night that forced customers to either hide or flee.

Thornton police reported "multiple parties down" and advised people to stay away from the area as dozens of police cruisers and emergency vehicles raced to the scene.

The men died at the store, and the woman died at a hospital.

Police spokesman Victor Avila said a man nonchalantly entered the store and fired a handgun into a group of people before fleeing in a car. No one has been arrested.

"This is a very heinous act," Avila said. "We don't know exactly what the motive of the person was, but it was certainly a terrible act."

All you need to do is read the names of the people who he killed and you'll know the motive:

[Scott] Ostrem is accused of casually walking into a Thornton Walmart at 6:10 p.m. Wednesday and fatally shooting 52-year-old Pamela Marques, of Denver; 66-year-old Carlos Moreno, of Thornton; and 26-year-old Victor Vasquez, of Denver.

He calmly, coldly and methodically murdered three people with Hispanic names. Was that an accident? These were people he didn't know. People he just picked at random in a Walmart.

His actual motive is irrelevant. His actions, intentional or not, terrorize and ethnic minority to advance an overt political goal -- to chase Hispanics out of the country. That's the definition of terrorism.

His lawyer will tell him to deny this motivation, because if he admits to terrorism or racial animus he'll be stuck with a much bigger sentence. So we'll ever hear the truth.

But you know the Trump voters clamoring for The Wall are cheering this guy on. They got the message the Walmart killer sent. And some of them will take this as an inspiration. And this act of terrorism will be repeated. Only the next guy will take pages out of the books of Dylann Roof and the Vegas shooter: he'll be outfitted with a bump stock and he'll shoot up a Catholic Church during a Spanish-language mass.

Every time a white guy -- like this guy, or the Vegas mass murderer, or the Colorado theater killer, or Gabby Gifford's would-be assassin -- shoots a bunch of people conservatives just blow it off.  They dismiss the killers as nut jobs or psychos. And then they say, "That's the price of freedom."

But when a Muslim kills someone, or a black man simply takes a knee during the national anthem, it's a terrible travesty and we have to lock up all Muslims, eliminate due process and cancel the first amendment.

Because freedom isn't for Muslims or black football players. Freedom is only for white guys with guns.

Trump Deserves the Same Fate as Weinstein and All the Others Losing Their Jobs

In the last year or so, dozens of men have been fired from their positions of power for harassing women. It started slowly, first with was Roger Ailes, then Bill O'Reilly, then a variety of lesser Fox hosts and producers. Gretchen Carlson and and Megyn Kelly left Fox News, disgusted with Trump and management that allowed women to be treated like dogmeat.

In the last few weeks the steady drip has turned into a torrent: after dozens of women accused Harvey Weinstein of sexual harassment and worse, he was fired from his company. Others in Hollywood, including Kevin Spacey, have lost their jobs. Several men in Silicon Valley (SoFi and Uber) have been fired. NPR's editorial director was fired for kissing women (with tongue) in job interviews while he was at the New York Times' Washington Bureau in the '90s.

Now the British government is starting to collapse with sexual harassment revelations:

British defense minister Michael Fallon quit on Wednesday, the first resignation in a growing sexual harassment scandal that prompted calls for a wholesale change in the “locker room” culture in parliament.

"Locker room" culture. Curious choice of words, that. Last year Donald Trump was caught on video bragging about sexually assaulting multiple women. He dismissed it as "locker room" talk. Yet he still -- albeit with the help of the Russians and James Comey -- managed to capture a majority of the electoral votes in the election.

Many of the men who have been accused have admitted wrongdoing and apologized for their actions, including Fallon, Spacey, and even Weinstein. Some are entering treatment.

A dozen women have confirmed Trump's brag of sexual assault, yet Trump's press secretary says those women are lying. So was Trump lying privately to Billy Bush when he bragged about pussy grabbing? Or is Trump lying publicly now?

The irony is that the main reason so many women have finally found the courage to report the sexual assaults against them is the election of Donald Trump. As former Fox News host Gretchen Carlson said on the Daily Show, she used the Trump tape as a teaching moment for her 11- and 13-year-old children on how not to treat a human being.

If Weinstein, Spacey, Ailes, O'Reilly and the defense minister of Britain can lose their jobs for sexual assaults they committed 20 and 30 years ago, then Trump's crimes are fair game for an impeachment hearing. Republicans went after Bill Clinton for less egregious offenses when they impeached him.

When are the "moral majority" Republicans going to live up to the morality they so loudly profess?

Probably never. Trump just bought them all off by including a provision in the tax bill that would allow churches to endorse political candidates. This will allow people to funnel tax-deductible contributions into churches that are just fronts for candidates. It's an outright and outrageous vote-buying scheme by Trump.

This is the real reason that so many evangelicals think that God ordained Trump's victory: money, money, money!

Why Not Release All the Kennedy Documents?

Last week Donald Trump released a bunch of documents related to the investigation of the Kennedy assassination. After millions of people dug through the document dump, apparently there were no new revelations.

However, Trump did not release everything. He held back certain documents.

For the last 50 years most of the speculation about the assassination has been about the magic bullet theory, the number of shooters, and whether Oswald acted alone. That's less interesting than the real question: who ordered the shooting?

Various conspiracy theories have posited that the CIA, the Cubans, and the mob. However, let's look back on the assassination in light of what we know today.

Oswald, a US marine, had defected to the Soviet Union in 1959. In Minsk Oswald married a Russian woman. Oswald returned to the US in 1962. Oswald was an agitator for a pro-Cuba group. Oswald visited the Soviet embassy in Mexico days before killing Kennedy.

The most obvious and logical conclusion is that the Russians had been grooming Oswald as an assassin for years, and they gave the order to kill Kennedy.

Why would the Russians do that? Well, Kennedy had embarrassed them mightily the year before during the Cuban Missile crisis. He called the Russians' bluff. Kennedy had also plotted to assassinate their puppet Castro and was interfering with their machinations in southeast Asia.

The CIA and the FBI most likely came to this same conclusion, but getting hard evidence to prove it would be almost impossible. And what good would it do? If it got out that Oswald was a KGB assassin our only public recourse would be to go to war, which would result in nuclear Armageddon, which neither the US nor Russia wanted.

Fast forward to today. If the documents do in fact implicate the Russians it would be extremely embarrassing to Trump since he's being investigated for colluding with the Russians to win the election. Holding back these documents now makes him look complicit in the coverup of the assassination of Kennedy.

I'm not the only one to come to this conclusion. After thinking this through I did some Google searches, and the top hit was this story on, of all places, Fox News. The conclusion of the author, Douglas Schoen:

It is clear that the reason for this withholding is that these files must involve Russia and to this day, we do not know is the role that Soviet Russia played in President Kennedy’s assassination.

The reason this is important is that we're seeing the same pattern of Russian interference in American politics today. The Russians are manipulating popular opinion with their propaganda outlets, stretching their tentacles into Facebook and Twitter, spreading lies and sowing division.

They've even sent Russian women to the United States to infiltrate the alt-right movement. Like Lee Harvey Oswald, alt-right pioneer Richard Spencer married a Russian woman. Another Russian woman in the US is Lana Lokteff, who runs an alt-right propaganda mill with her Swedish husband.

Also, note that there are Russian connections to Islamic extremist attacks in the United States in the last few years: yesterday's attack in New York was committed by Sayfullo Saipov, a man from Uzbekistan, a former Soviet Republic. The Boston Marathon bombers, Dzhokar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, were Russian-speaking Chechens. Chechens have been convicted of numerous assassinations of politicians and journalists who were opposed to Putin. The Russians have assassinated Putin's enemies across the world, including the United States and Britain.

Russia's propping up of Assad in Syria escalated the number of refugees fleeing to Europe, giving cover to many ISIS terrorists who committed massive attacks in France, Britain and Belgium, destabilizing many European governments and precipitating the breakup of the EU.

Given how so many of Putin's enemies wind up dead, it's not surprising that Trump doesn't want to cross the Russians by releasing documents that implicate them in Kennedy's assassination. Trump's constant kowtowing to Putin clearly indicates he is afraid of the Russian's wrath.

The Russians are waging an all-out cyber and propaganda war on the United States, trying to divide and conquer us with race baiting and similar divisive issues. Are we going to let Trump's Russian puppet masters drive into another Civil War, or are going to unite against the real threat: the destruction of democracies across the world, riven by racial animosity fueled by Russian hate-mongering?

The Hillary Card

Speaking of Sinking Ships...

While researching the rat-infested sinking ship metaphor that is the Trump administration, I came across another tidbit that shows what a terrible deal maker Trump is.

In 1987 Trump bought a yacht from the Sultan of Brunei for $29 million. The next year Trump bragged that he got $1 million off for changing the name, to the Trump Princess, naming the boat after himself (yes, he is a little princess).

Trump paid $10 million to refit the yacht, putting a T on the helipad instead of the standard H. Trump started construction on an even bigger yacht, then bought the shipbuilder Amels. Trump sold the company a couple of months later due to financial problems.

Trump sold the Trump Princess in 1991 for $19 million, for a total $20 million loss. What a smart businessman!

The Dominos Begin to Fall

Three people associated with the Trump campaign have been arrested or pleaded guilty to crimes involving the Russians and money laundering:

President Trump’s campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, was indicted Monday on charges that he funneled millions of dollars through overseas shell companies and used the money to buy luxury cars, real estate, antiques and expensive suits.

The charges against Mr. Manafort and his longtime associate Rick Gates represent a significant escalation in a special counsel investigation that has cast a shadow over Mr. Trump’s first year in office.

Separately, one of the early foreign policy advisers to Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign, George Papadopoulos, pleaded guilty to lying to the F.B.I. about a contact with a professor with ties to Kremlin officials, prosecutors said on Monday.

Trump invoked the standard Republican ploy of accusing Democrats of doing the thing that he did, claiming that Clinton was involved with the Russians, bogus charges that were dismissed years ago.

These charges were long anticipated -- after all, Manafort was forced out of the Trump campaign because of his Russian connections. The FBI raid on Manafort's house during the summer was a clear indication that he was going to be charged.

Republicans like Bob Corker, Jeff Flake and John McCain, who have openly condemned Trump's behavior, will certainly feel vindicated.

Let us hope that these developments give other honorable men to desert Trump's sinking ship, leaving only the rats aboard his foundering administration.

How on EARTH are they called racists?

It always cracks me up when the right can't figure out why people are always calling them racist. They immediately go to being super offended and foam at the mouth about race baiting. Perhaps directing the FBI to label black identity groups as domestic terrorists might be a good indicator why they are perceived as being racist.

In the FBI’s report, BIE is described as a conglomeration of black nationalists, black supremacists, and black separatists, among other disaffiliated racist individuals who are anti-police, anti-white, and/or seeking to rectify perceived social injustices against blacks. The FBI essentially merged these various black hate groups under one umbrella, giving it a new name, in the hopes of classifying these groups as an organized extremist movement.

I guess that would include the Black Lives Matter movement as well.

As is usually the case, we have an enormous amount of projection. The domestic terrorists are on the right, not the left. The ones we should be worried about are the NRA, Spencer's band of white nationalists and nearly all of the supporters of Donald Trump.

Conservative Website First Funded Anti-Trump Research by Firm That Later Produced Dossier

Whenever conservatives start foaming at the mouth about Hillary Clinton did, give it about 48 hours and it will eventually come out that it was really them that started it all.

They Are All Dropping Like Flies...Except Trump

United States culture is changing. No longer are we going to tolerate men treating women like they are second class citizens, property, and objects for their childish, sexual desires. Over the course of the last several months we've seen Roger Ailes, Bill O' Reilly, and Harvey Weinstein all go away because they harassed and sexually assaulted/abused various women. The most recent harasser is MSNBC's Mark Halperin. I've been a pretty big fan of his over the last decade and was pretty shocked when the revelations about him came out.

In contrast, we still see the Misogynist in Chief in the Oval Office and I find that interesting for a number of reasons. It's very likely that there are many women out there who have been harassed, assaulted and abused by Donald Trump. Why haven't they come forward? Are these other guys merely low hanging fruit?

Perhaps they are afraid given that he is the president and maybe they are concerned over what it might do to the country. Regardless, I think it's only a mater of time before someone or several someones come forward. My hope is that it's right around the time we find out Trump and his team worked with the Russians to win the election.

Yet even if no one comes forward, Trump's world of being able to grab women by the pussy is shrinking rapidly. Men exhibiting similar behavior to what he has done over the years have been fired and shunned from every day society. That type of bullshit is simply no longer tolerated. There is no doubt that Trump's presidency is having an adverse affect on many areas of our culture but this is not one of them. In fact, I think his being elected has hastened a change that has been a long time in coming.

Women are equal to men and should be respected.

Don't Bully Except...

The Fate of a Quintessential Right-Wing Blogger

I'd never heard of Lane Davis, but I'd heard of all the things that consumed him as a conspiracy theorist. He worked as a blogger for The Ralph Retort, a right-wing website.

Davis was an avid Trump fan and wrote that he would vote for Trump even if he killed the pope.

Davis relentlessly pushed the misogynistic GamerGate movement, mercilessly attacking women who work in the computer game industry, then turned against his GamerGate fellows in a dispute over credit.

Davis was an acolyte of and unpaid intern for Milo Yiannopoulos. Yiannopoulos is a gay ultra-conservative Catholic and woman hater who frequently espouses racist garbage. He is married to a black man and condemns Pope Francis for being too liberal.

Davis was convinced that the phony Pizzagate pedophile ring was true, even after another right-wing nutjob shot the place up and Alex Jones of Infowars infamy disavowed the conspiracy. He believed Seth Rich had been murdered to silence him over Pizzagate.

And then one morning last July Davis started ranting nonstop at his parents about liberal pedophiles taking over the country. His mother called 911, which only made him more paranoid. He spat in his father's face and stabbed him to death with a kitchen knife.

You would have thought such a grisly murder would have been a big deal in the "liberal media." You would think that they would have milked this story for all it was worth, with CNN and the New York Times splashing big headlines about the "Pizzagater Patricide" and how right-wing blogs turn people into father murderers.

But no. If you google Lane Davis you find references to him only in the local Seattle paper from July and August. Then there are some references to the case in the last week or so on a computer gaming forum and the Ralph Retort. The "liberal media" ignored this murder until the Daily Beast wrote about it today, months after it happened.

I've always called Fox News "political pornography," because they know they're selling a pack of fantastical lies to give racists and misogynists their jollies. But Fox News is soft-core porn. People like Alex Jones and Milo Yiannopoulos know the extreme conspiracy theories they're pushing are hard-core pornographic lies, literally in the case of Pizzagate.

But some people can't separate truth from lies. The lies drive them mad. The lies drive them to shoot up pizza places and kill their dads.

Yet these right-wing sites keep pushing outrageous lies at these vulnerable people, all for monetary and political gain. How many more of their own followers are they going to sacrifice to the god of profit?