Amazon Is Now Officially the Evil Empire

Amazon.com started as an online book retailer 23 years ago. They were great: I started buying stuff from them in 1995. They branched out to CDs and DVDs pretty quickly, and then started selling absolutely everything. 

They became a front-end to thousands of other smaller retailers, helping them get into the online marketplace. They developed the Kindle and started selling e-books in a big way, practically creating the market from scratch.

They started selling online video, mostly reruns of TV episodes and some movies, about the same time Netflix began to offer their streaming service. Like Netflix, they've started producing a their own content, offering series like The Man in the High Castle and The Tick.

Jeff Bezos, the founder, has used his billions to acquire the Washington Post and even started his own rocket launch company, Blue Horizon (his rockets look like flying dildos). And just the other day Amazon acquired Whole Foods Market.

Sadly, Amazon has used its market clout to become a monopoly. It started innocently enough with the Amazon Prime service, which locks you into Amazon's ecosystem by offering free shipping and special deals.

Now small online retailers are being screwed by Amazon. To have online street cred you have to be listed on Amazon, and Amazon always lists their version of your product before your website. That means Amazon is always taking a thick percentage from your sales, a sort of online mafia protection racket.

People think that Amazon offers the best price. They don't. Using the terabytes of data they collect on you and everyone else, their algorithms offer you the highest price they think you'll pay, and hide lower prices from you.

For some time Amazon has been looking into expanding into the brick and mortar world from the online world to better compete with Walmart and Target, having already crushed OfficeMax, K-Mart, Sears and other retailers. They have been building warehouses around the country to decrease shipping time and costs. The acquisition of Whole Foods is another big step in that direction.

Amazon even has a plan to tighten their grip on people who will be shopping in their brick and mortar stores. As reported in the Washington Post, ironically enough:

Amazon was awarded a patent May 30 that could help it choke off a common issue faced by many physical stores: Customers’ use of smartphones to compare prices even as they walk around a shop. The phenomenon, often known as mobile “window shopping,” has contributed to a worrisome decline for traditional retailers.

[Amazon's in-store wi-fi network may] block access to the competitor’s site, preventing customers from viewing comparable products from rivals. It might redirect the customer to Amazon’s own site or to other, Amazon-approved sites. It might notify an Amazon salesperson to approach the customer. 

Yes, now that Amazon is in the real world, they want to stop other companies from doing to Amazon what Amazon did to them.

Well, you say, why should Amazon let customers use their network to access competitors' web sites? Why can't customers just use their cell phone network? For one thing, cell reception is frequently terrible in big steel buildings, which is why stores provide wi-fi. Active cell phone jamming is [currently] illegal, but Amazon could easily turn their stores into giant Faraday cages with a little bit of chicken wire embedded in the concrete to passively block cell reception.

Or Amazon could cut deals with cell phone providers to block or slow customers' access to certain web sites on cell towers near Amazon stores. That would be perfectly allowable now that the Trump administration has dumped net neutrality.

Amazon is also providing Internet service through Frontier Communications. Are they going to use their patent to block access to their competitors through that service as well?

I like the Washington Post. I like Blue Origin. I want to like Amazon. What I don't like is that Bezos is creating a monopoly and using that power to destroy other companies, taking money out of local communities and sending it all to Seattle.

Walmart started this trend, destroying local businesses and replacing them with giant superstores that eliminated millions of small retail jobs, especially in rural America (Walmart has completely wiped out local retail in rural Minnesota). Now Amazon is going to do Walmart one better, replacing employees with warehouse robots, self-driving long-haul trucks, delivery drones and completely automatic checkout.

You'll know the end is nigh when Jeff Bezos announces that he's going to use his New Glenn rockets to launch his Amazon Death Star.

Is It Time Now?

Every time there's a horrific mass shooting, the NRA says it's not time to talk about gun violence. However, in the aftermath of the shooting on the baseball field in Virginia, it is time to discuss the the ridiculousness of the idea that "guns are protection."

People playing baseball can't carry guns. You can't swing a bat or run bases or field the ball with an AK-47 slung over your shoulder. And even if you could, it wouldn't help.

See, the bad guys don't play fair. They shoot you in the back, at a distance, from cover, when you're least expecting it. A shooter who knows what he's doing can fire off 40-60 rounds in less than 30 seconds, easily hitting five, ten, even 20 victims if the targets are closely grouped. By the time anyone realizes what's happening a dozen people are shot.

Ironically, the morning of the shooting the House was scheduled to hear a bill on making it easier to buy silencers. As always, they came up with a phony reason for the bill: hearing protection.

But what it really does is protect assassins, allowing them to kill more people by making it harder for their victims to tell where the shots are coming from. Silencers don't completely suppress the report of a rifle (and they can degrade accuracy), but they make it harder to hear the shots, and a lot harder to identify the shooter's location.

People at Wednesday's incident knew there was a shooting because they could hear the shooting. 

With a silencer the shooter would have even more time to take pot shots at people on the field: victims would start falling, one by one, with no obvious reason why. He might have shot 10 people instead of just five.

But back to the silliness of the idea of guns providing "protection." Having a gun will not stop you from getting shot. Two cops were on duty protecting Congressman Scalise: they (or the Alexandria police, who responded within minutes) eventually got the shooter, but they were also wounded. Having a gun makes you a high-priority target.

What does provide protection is body armor. Reports aren't clear on this, but the shooter doesn't appear to have been wearing any. However, the Aurora theater shooter was, according to CNN: "Holmes spent 903.67 on body armor: a bulletproof torso and neck protector, bulletproof arm protection and two different bulletproof groin protectors." It's nuts that that nut was able to buy body armor.

If the Virginia shooter had been fully decked out the way the NRA and Republicans apparently wanted him to be, with an assault rifle, high capacity magazines, body armor and a silencer, he could have fired hundreds of rounds for an hour or more before they finally put the animal down.

Conservatives always want to put a political, partisan or racist spin on every incident, to "prove" they're right. But the problem is not right vs. left, conservative vs. liberal, Christian vs. Muslim.

It's really a conflict between those who use chaos and violence against those who advocate for law and peace.

Those who think that assault rifles, silencers and body armor belong in the hands of any random, unbalanced, incompetent civilian are on the side of chaos and violence.

It's true that guns aren't the only way to kill people: terrorists have used bombs, trucks, cars, machetes, and knives to kill. But soldiers don't drive semis and carry machetes into battle: they use guns because they inflict maximum carnage.

Angry, child-beating civilians like the Virginia shooter should not be carrying weapons of war on the streets of America.

Yeah, we can't save everyone. But if we could cut our murder and suicide rates by two, or five or ten, by keeping guns out of the hands of people who have demonstrated they are prone to violence or depression, wouldn't that be worth it to save 15,000 or 25,000 lives?

We put child pornographers who've never even touched a kid on sex offender registries for their entire lives, restricting their constitutional rights to freedom of association and movement forever, banning them from getting any number of jobs and drastically affecting their everyday lives.

Yet we allow wife-beaters and bar-brawlers who have actually hurt real people to own guns when the evidence is clear that such people are much more likely to commit gun violence. Not having a gun would not affect these people's everyday lives. Yes, they could still hunt: there are these things called bows.

Steve Scalise, the Lousiana congressman who was shot in the pelvis on Wednesday, is one of those Republicans who blew a bowel every time someone suggested we do something about the epidemic of gun violence in this country.

Well, this time the shooter blew Scalise's bowel for him. And Scalise may need to wear a colostomy bag for the rest of his life.

Virginia Gun Laws Explained

Since the shooting in Alexandria on Wednesday, we've heard the usual nonsense from  the Gun Cult regarding strict regulations and how if only those members were allowed to carry a gun, things might not have been so bad. They seem to forget that the Capital police (armed) were on the scene and did their job.

Further, gun laws in Virginia are pretty lax. No permit is required to purchase a long gun or hand gun. There is no registration. Virginia is a "shall issue" state for concealed carry. Permits are not issued to non-residents and training is permitted online or in person. Open carry is allowed although Alexandria has an exception for this on assault weapons. These restrictions do not apply for concealed carry permit holders. They have no background checks for private sales and no magazine restrictions.

So, what the fuck is the Gun Cult talking about? Anyone at the baseball game could have been armed to the teeth but they weren't. Why?

Trump Now Under Investigation

President Trump has said for weeks that he is not under investigation. He claimed vindication after Comey's testimony last week. But now it appears that Robert Mueller, the special prosecutor in this case, is investigating Trump himself for possible obstruction of justice. As has been the case with past presidents, it's not the crime itself that they get dinged for. It's the cover up.

What could possibly be so bad about Russia that Trump would go to such lengths as to put himself in legal jeopardy?

Anger, Hate, and Fear Come Home To Roost

GOP Congressmen felt the wraith of a psychotic yesterday in the form of one James Hodgkinson of Belleville, Illinois. In ten gut wrenching minutes, Hodgkinson shot up a baseball field where many House reps were practicing for a charity game. At this point, the only fatality is Hodgkinson himself although House Majority Whip, Steve Saclise is still in critical condition after being hit in the hip.

As I suspected, the blame for this is being laid at the feet of the "hateful rhetoric" of the left. That's like the pyromaniac accusing someone suffering from pyrophobia of starting a fire. Worse, the relaxed attitude towards gun violence and total instransigence on enhancing firearm regulation lead to events like this every day. I'm reminding of the following verse from the Bible.

Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap ( King James Version of the Bible, Epistle to the Galatians, 6:7).

It was only a matter of time before some angry, nut job on the left easily acquired firearms and went after the folks who made it easier to do so. This guy would have never had the guns he did had Republicans taken steps over the years to restrict access to firearms. Under current law, however, he legally purchased the assault rifle used yesterday in the shooting. Rand Paul, who was present at the shooting, said were it not for the Capital police (trained, armed professionals), it would have been worse. I'm wondering if they will learn anything from this horrific event.

Sadly, I doubt it. What will likely happen is a call for Congressmen to arm themselves at all times. Or more about how liberals are all incendiary revolutionists bent on taking down the state. I've been saying for years that this kind of event is what will change the minds of those folks who don't recognize the reality of gun violence.

The reality of their epistemic closure tells me otherwise.

Praising Dear Leader

Quite possibly the most disturbing thing I have seen yet from the Trump Administration. Other than SecDef Mattis, what a bunch of mindless sycophants. Is Trump so insecure that he needs that much praise? And how about all the out and out lying? He hasn't done anything!

I'll be throwing up now the rest of the day.

Trump Doesn't Even Want the Travel Ban

Another appeals court handed Trump another failure today: 

The key part of the executive order suspended travel from six predominantly Muslim countries for 90 days to give the administration time to conduct a review. If that review can be completed, the justices may decide that the case is or will soon be moot. 

Like the Fourth Circuit, Judge Watson blocked major parts of the revised order on the ground that they violated the Constitution’s ban on a government establishment of religion. Judge Watson wrote that the statements of Mr. Trump and his advisers made clear that his executive order amounted to an attempt to disfavor Muslims.

“A reasonable, objective observer — enlightened by the specific historical context, contemporaneous public statements and specific sequence of events leading to its issuance — would conclude that the executive order was issued with a purpose to disfavor a particular religion,” Judge Watson wrote.

Trump's second travel ban was supposed to be temporary, but was sabotaged by Trump's own anti-Muslim statements, causing the ban to be hung up in court for as long as it was supposed to last.

The thing is, Trump's guys had to know this would happen, because the first Muslim ban was smacked down fast and hard, and the rewrite was not substantially different.

Either these people are total idiots (a definite possibility), or they just don't care that the ban will never take effect. My guess is that they never really wanted it.

Trump and his cronies are just putting on a show for the rubes, pretending to be all anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant. Meanwhile Trump is selling weapons to Saudi Arabia, which has been supporting anti-American terrorists for decades, and cutting deals with Middle Eastern countries, opening a golf course in Dubai with his name on it just a month after his inauguration. And then Trump insulted Qatar, the Middle Eastern country with the largest American military base. (Remember, 9/11 happened because Osama bin Laden was insulted by the presence of American military bases in Saudi Arabia.)

The only apparent purpose of the travel ban is to create a pretext for Trump's continued attacks on the courts. He's rallying support among the Republican base to further undermine the standing of the entire judicial system.

To what end? Is Trump hoping to foment assassination attempts against federal judges in the same way he has sparked attacks on Indian engineers in a Kansas bar and girls on a Portland light rail train? Is Trump purposely sowing chaos and murder? Or is he so oblivious that he has no conception of the damage he is doing to this country?

Trump loves to say that the world is laughing at us -- he's said this literally hundreds of times.

But the truth is, they're laughing at Trump. They think he's a coarse, bumbling buffoon. The British don't even want Trump in their country.

Every day it becomes clearer that Trump isn't the president, he's a comic book villain -- the clown prince of the United States. In the comics Superman's Lex Luthor was elected president, but in this reality show world we got stuck with Batman's Joker.

No, the rest of the world isn't laughing at the United States -- they're shaking their heads in sorrow and disbelief that the people of the United States were conned by an incompetent racist, sexist provocateur who doesn't even want the job of running the country.

Putin's Seal

I used to really like Jesse Ventura. He started off as an OK governor, for the most part. But he ended up like all those other loud and rebellious libertarians out there...not knowing what the fuck he was doing. They can bitch and bitch but they don't know how to actually solve any problems.

So, it's not surprising to me that he now works for RT. After all, his ideology fits perfectly with the audience they have captured-angry, old white people who hate both parties and are all too willing to be co-opted by Russian intelligence.

What happened to these folks? Is there hatred for liberals so great that they let it blind them from what is happening?

Trump's Pick For FBI Works For Law Firm that Represents Russian Oil Interests

USA Today has a piece up regarding Trump's pick to run the FBI, Christopher Wray. Check out this part.

The most troubling issue that Wray may face is the fact that his law firm — King & Spalding — represents Rosneft and Gazprom, two of Russia’s largest state-controlled oil companies. 

Rosneft was prominently mentioned in the now infamous 35-page dossier prepared by former British MI6 agent Christopher Steele. The dossier claims that the CEO of Rosneft, Igor Sechin, offered candidate Donald Trump, through Trump’s campaign advisor Carter Page, a 19% stake in the company in exchange for lifting U.S. sanctions on Russia. The dossier claims that the offer was made in July while Page was in Moscow.

Troubling indeed. Here are my questions:

Why did Trump pick him?

Did he work for Rosneft and Gazprom while his firm represented both of these entities? If so, how?

Wray has a lot to answer if he is going to become Trumps pick for the FBI.

Follow the Lawyers...

You ever see one of those movies where the cops catch one of the little fish in a criminal conspiracy and stuff him in an interrogation room? He's the foot soldier who killed an FBI agent on orders from the big bad because he wouldn't stop the investigation. 

The cops are badgering the guy to make a deal, and are starting to make some headway when all of a sudden the lieutenant walks in and stops the interrogation, saying, "Your lawyer is here."

And the foot soldiers says, "But I don't have a lawyer." And the lieutenant says, "Well, you do now."

We find out that the lawyer was hired by the big bad who ordered the hit. This lawyer isn't really representing the foot soldier. He's representing the big bad, making sure that everyone in the conspiracy stays on the same page, that the story is consistent and that no one turns on anyone else.

The same scenario is happening in the Trump-Russia investigation. The lawyer's name is Marc Kasowitz, and he represents Donald Trump and his Russian co-conspirators:

Marc E. Kasowitz’s clients include Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch who is close to President Vladimir Putin and has done business with Trump’s former campaign manager. Kasowitz also represents Sberbank, Russia’s largest state-owned bank, U.S. court records show.

Other juicy details:

In 2008, Forbes magazine listed Deripaska as the ninth-richest man in the world. In 2006, the United States revoked his visa to enter the country, citing possible ties to organized crime. He has denied those links, claiming the allegations are part of an effort to smear him.

Kasowitz represents Sberbank in a 2016 lawsuit that is still in its preliminary stages. An owner of a Russian granite-mining business accuses the bank of conspiring with competitors to dismantle his company and seize its assets. The bank has not responded in court filings.

Sberbank was one of the sponsors of the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow produced by Trump, who owned the competition. The deputy head of the bank at the time was Sergey Gorkov, who met with [Jared] Kushner in December. Gorkov, a graduate of the academy of the Federal Security Service, or FSB, the domestic successor of the former Soviet KGB intelligence bureau, was named to head VEB in February 2016.

It's not clear who the big bad is in this movie. Is it Deripaska, the mob boss? Is it Gorkov, the banker? Is it Putin, the puppet master behind it all?

In all these scenarios Trump is the bumbling foot soldier who was caught red-handed murdering the FBI agent on the trail of the conspiracy.

In the movies, when it becomes clear that the lawyer is just setting up the foot soldier to take the fall, the fall guy gets his own lawyer and rats on the big bad in exchange for a lesser sentence. It rarely works out well for the foot soldier, who usually winds up with a shiv in the back while awaiting trial.

The Russians meddled in the US election to prevent Hillary Clinton from becoming president, to sow chaos in American politics and to weaken this country. They have succeeded in all their goals.

Now Trump is under investigation, waiting to see if there's going to be an impeachment trial. He's scared out of his tiny mind, wondering who's holding the shiv and when they'll strike.

Republicans in congress, take note: do you want to be added to the list of the Trump's co-conspirators, or help get justice for the FBI agent?

Meanwhile...

Comey A Go Go

My first reaction to James Comey's testimony yesterday was not the remarks themselves but the reaction to them from various media.

CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, The Washington Post and most of the regular news media looked at the entirety of his testimony and gave fairly honest reporting. The right wing media (and President Trump) all cried vindication which I found to be quite at odds with reality. They also accused Comey of lying so I don't understand how Trump was vindicated if Comey was lying. How can it be both? The right wing media also went on about Hillary's emails and leakers which entirely avoids the core issue: Trump and his people colluding with the Russians.

There were no major revelations yesterday. Comey said what everyone thought he would say. The investigation with a special prosecutor (Robert Mueller) will continue and that's a good thing. Trump is not going to be able to avoid what's coming next. Honestly, I'm less worried about him these days because he's so fucking stupid. Clearly, he is his own worst enemy.

What concerns me is his legion of followers who now have all become willing receptacles of Russian propaganda. Here's a clue, assholes. Just because a link on your social media feed looks all hot and stuff with it's political porno words like "mainstream media" and "smug liberal elite" doesn't mean you should pay attention to it. They are trying to fucking brainwash you, morons. Ignore it!

Oh, and if you are offended by me calling you an asshole or a moron, you can take your precious snowflake attitude and juxtapose it with your dear leader. He won an election by doing the exact same thing.

Telling it like it is!

Entitled Consevatives

Conservatives think that liberals have the corner market on entitlement. They whine and foam at the mouth about how liberals, especially the ones on college campuses, are massively entitled, need their safe spaces and want to protest everything.

Yet, this recent piece in the Times shows that climate deniers on the right are the absolute worst when it comes to entitlement. Check this out.

When the teacher, James Sutter, ascribed the recent warming of the Earth to heat-trapping gases released by burning fossil fuels like the coal her father had once mined, she asserted that it could be a result of other, natural causes.

When he described the flooding, droughts and fierce storms that scientists predict within the century if such carbon emissions are not sharply reduced, she challenged him to prove it. “Scientists are wrong all the time,” she said with a shrug, echoing those celebrating President Trump’s announcement last week that the United States would wit“It’s not about opinions,” he told her. “It’s about the evidence.”

“It’s like you can’t disagree with a scientist or you’re ‘denying science,”’ she sniffed to her friends.

Gwen, 17, could not put her finger on why she found Mr. Sutter, whose biology class she had enjoyed, suddenly so insufferable. Mr. Sutter, sensing that his facts and figures were not helping, was at a loss. And the day she grew so agitated by a documentary he was showing that she bolted out of the school left them both shaken.hdraw from the Paris climate accord.

When Mr. Sutter lamented that information about climate change had been removed from the White House website after Mr. Trump’s inauguration, she rolled her eyes.

“It’s his website,” she said.

What an entitled baby! I'm hearing information I don't like.....wah!!!!! Seriously, how is this any different from the folks that whine on campus about hearing words they don't like or that offend them. Like most climate deniers, they are in eternal, adolescent rebellion mode. Oh well...

At least some of the folks in the class recognize reality and changed their minds.

Trump Is Losing . . . Our Allies

The United States, after being the only superpower in the world for almost 30 years, is quickly losing influence around the world. All because Donald Trump is a stupid dickhead trying to impress stupid dickheads in the United States.

Trump attended a NATO meeting last month and refused to endorse the core tenet of the organization: the pledge that if one member state is attacked, all member states will come to its defense.

Trump has insulted Germany, our ally for over 70 years, over and over again. As a result, Chancellor Angel Merkel recently said that it's time for Europe to takes its fate into its own hands -- a clear rejection of Trump and the United States.

Trump has insulted the French, our ally since, well, before we were even a country, by pulling out of the Paris climate treaty and claiming that he was elected to represent Pittsburgh, not Paris. Yes, we know they both start with P, but alliteration won't help Trump: the citizens of Pittsburgh voted for Hillary Clinton by a landslide of 75%.

Trump's rejection of the climate accord has the effect of handing over our dominance in world affairs to the Chinese.

Trump has insulted the South Koreans by rushing to install a missile defense system before the newly elected president, Moon Jae-in, was in office. Moon has now suspended the installation of the missile system, and is talking about doing an environmental review to delay it even further.

Trump thinks he's protecting South Korea (and the American troops stationed there) from North Korean missile attacks, but all Trump is doing is driving South Korea into the arms of China.

Trump has insulted England, again and again. Most recently it was in the person of Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, whom Trump insulted in his typical mendacious fashion after seven Londoners were murdered by terrorists.

The UK is having an election tomorrow, and Theresa May, the conservative pro-Brexit prime minister, was a shoo-in just a month ago. But now the polls are neck-and-neck, in part because May is perceived as a Trump puppet who will never criticize the boorish American.

The United States used to be the most reliable and stable country in the world. Now we're run by a childish nutjob who makes Kim Jong-un look like an elder statesman.

Don't believe me? Just watch Trump's Twitter feed, where he undermines himself and his own administration's agenda every time he lays his fat fingers on his phone.

And that statement must be true because it used alliteration three times instead of just two!

Save Your Anger for Someone Other Than Bill Maher

Everyone is piling on Bill Maher for saying that word on live TV last week. But it shouldn't be all that surprising. He used to be on a show called "Politically Incorrect," which was canceled when Maher argued that the 9/11 hijackers weren't cowards because they were in the planes when they crashed.

Saying that word was stupid and insensitive and inexcusable, and he shouldn't have said it. He's admitted this himself in an apology, though people are blasting him because of an op-ed he wrote saying that such apologies are meaningless precisely because the offense is inexcusable.

That word has been used by whites for centuries in the most offensive way possible: to deny the very humanity of people who were abducted from their homelands and forced into slavery, treated like animals and worse.

Yet that word has gained currency in countless hip-hop songs. It is sometimes used almost as a term of endearment in some exchanges among African Americans.

Which makes some whites really angry. "Why do they get to use that word among themselves, and why can't I?" they moan.

It's a difference of quality: when African Americans use it, it can be self-deprecating, and almost humorous in certain contexts -- but not all contexts. When whites use it against blacks, it is always an insult, even if it's intended as a jest.

Hearing a white person say that word pours salt in an open wound that has festered for more than four centuries.

Which brings us back to Bill Maher. He was attempting to use that word as a self-deprecating joke. He was intending to insult himself, not black people: he's a wimpy New Yorker who hates the outdoors and always stays inside.

A lot of white people in the audience thought it was funny too. But descendants of slaves didn't get a chuckle out of it, though they probably grimaced in a sorrowful sort of smile that people do when they see someone who should know better do something very stupid.

However, there's different in quality between what Maher did and Klansman are doing when they use that word. When whites use it against African Americans it they're committing verbal homicide. Maher's use was merely verbal manslaughter. The victim is just as dead, but the penalty for the infraction is different.

People should instead direct their outrage at the Orangutan from New York who ran an election campaign that emboldened racists around the country, instead of at the comedian who has been fighting the good fight against that clown in the White House for more than a decade.

Bill Whittle Wordy Squirts Some Tired Old Shit

Bill Whittle is a hero to many in the right wing blogger sphere and now that he's officially a commentator for NRA TV, he can officially order his big boy pants. Yet Media Matters points out that he's resurrecting some very old and familiar lines about race.

During a 2016 appearance on libertarian-turned-“alt-right”-commentator Stefan Molyneux’s webshow, Whittle revealed his acceptance of theories commonly called “academic” or “scientific” racism that tie together IQ scores, race, and crime. He also positively cited a white nationalist to claim people in inner cities “don't have access to cognition.” 

 In the February 12 broadcast, which was released with the title “Why Liberals Are Wrong About Inequality,” Molyneux premised his discussion with Whittle with claims that in terms of average IQ scores, Ashkenazi Jews “clock in at about 115” and “after the Jews come the East Asians, right, the Koreans, the Chinese, the Japanese, and so on. They clock in at 105, 106, but very good on visual-spacial skills and very, very fast reaction times, which is another way that they measure intelligence. Caucasians come in at about 100 and then below that are Hispanics, clocking in at around 90, and then American blacks, clocking in at around 85 -- partly because they have 20 percent European mixture in their gene pool -- and then sub-Saharan Africans, clocking in at around 70, which is obviously very tragic, but this is the reality of what's happened. And slightly below that are the aboriginals in Australia, clocking in around 67 or whatever.”

Wow. Hey, right wing blogger and commenter dudes, hitch your wagon to this star. He's a winner!

Why They Win And We Lose

Leading From Way Behind

Putin Admits Russians Hacked US Election

It looks like the investigation into Russian hacking of the US election is starting to uncover solid evidence. Vladimir Putin has basically admitted the hacking:

Shifting from his previous blanket denials, President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia suggested on Thursday that “patriotically minded” private Russian hackers could have been involved in cyberattacks last year that meddled in the United States presidential election.

Putin ultimately said similar things about patriotic Russians fighting in Crimea, after denying that there were any Russian troops there. But Russian troops were constantly fighting in Crimea, indiscriminately killing civilians -- including those from the Netherlands, Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia and Great Britain:

A Dutch-led investigation has concluded that the powerful surface-to-air missile system used to shoot down a Malaysia Airlines plane over Ukraine two years ago, killing all 298 on board, was trucked in from Russia at the request of Russian-backed separatists and returned to Russia the same night.

And how does Trump respond to Putin's admission of hacking? The Donald is going to let the Russians reopen their den of spies:

The Trump administration is moving toward handing back to Russia two diplomatic compounds, near New York City and on Maryland’s Eastern Shore, that its officials were ejected from in late December as punishment for Moscow’s interference in the 2016 presidential election.

President Barack Obama said Dec. 29 that the compounds were being “used by Russian personnel for intelligence-related purposes” and gave Russia 24 hours to vacate them. Separately, Obama expelled from the United States what he said were 35 Russian “intelligence operatives.”

This is particularly disturbing in light of this news:

In the throes of the 2016 campaign, the FBI found itself with an escalating problem: Russian diplomats, whose travel was supposed to be tracked by the State Department, were going missing. The diplomats, widely assumed to be intelligence operatives, would eventually turn up in odd places, often in middle-of-nowhere USA.

One was found on a beach, nowhere near where he was supposed to be. In one particularly bizarre case, relayed by a U.S. intelligence official, another turned up wandering around in the middle of the desert. Interestingly, both seemed to be lingering where underground fiber-optic cables tend to run.

Yes, it appears that the Russians are not satisfied with sabotaging our elections via the Internet, they appear to be planning to sabotage our Internet hardware infrastructure as well.

Trump keeps claiming that he's not colluding with the Russians. But every time Vladimir Putin says "bend over" Trump asks "how far?"

Whining Wonder Woman Wankers

After a couple of theaters announced they were going to have women-only screenings the new Wonder Woman film, a flock of insecure little bitches had to whine about it. 

One childish wanker apparently wrote a letter to the mayor of Austin threatening to boycott the city if they didn't host a men-only event:

"I hope every man will boycott Austin and do what he can to diminish Austin and to cause damage to the city's image. The theater that pandered to the sexism typical of women will, I hope, regret it's decision. The notion of a woman hero is a fine example of women's eagerness to accept the appearance of achievement without actual achievement. Women learn from an early age to value make-up, that it's OK to pretend that you are greater than you actually are. Women pretend they do not know that only men serve in combat because they are content to have an easier ride. Women gladly accept gold medals at the Olympics for coming in 10th and competing only against the second class of athletes. Name something invented by a woman! Achievements by the second rate gender pale in comparison to virtually everything great in human history was accomplished by men, not women. If Austin does not host a men only counter event, I will never visit Austin and will welcome it's deterioration. And I will not forget that Austin is best known for Charles Whitman. Does Austin stand for gender equality or for kissing up to women? Don't bother to respond. I already know the answer. I do not hate women. I hate their rampant hypocrisy and the hypocrisy of the 'women's movement.' Women do not want gender equality; they want more for women. Don't bother to respond because I am sure your cowardice will generate nothing worth reading.

"Richard A. Ameduri"

The mayor gamely responded by alerting the writer to the fact that his email had been hacked. And then he proceeded to list several things that women did invent, including a system for torpedo control that actress Hedy Lamarr patented in 1941, which just happened to become the basis of spread-spectrum communications systems like wi-fi and cell-phone service.  But that's not important.

The mayor didn't mention Marie Curie, but she won the Nobel Prize in physics for her work on radiation in 1903 and then went on to win another Nobel in chemistry in 1911, after the death of her husband, becoming the first person of any gender to win Nobels in two different disciplines. And those "10th place" women Olympic martial artists would wipe the floor with Mr. Ameduri.

Speaking of the martial arts, Gal Gadot, the star of Wonder Woman, was a combat trainer in the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), where she served for two years. Why? Because Israel requires women to serve two years in the military -- though, yes, Israeli women get an easy ride: the men have to serve for three years. Except for ultra-Orthodox conservative Haredi men, who don't have to serve in the military, or even work at all. But their wives do.

In any case, a private theater chain is hosting this special one-shot screening. All the other showings of the film will be to mixed gender audiences. The mayor can't demand the theater schedule a men-only screening any more than the mayor of Houston can demand that the Astros hire a female pitcher.

On average men make 25% more than women doing the same job. Men constitute 95% of all Fortune 500 CEOs. Men like Donald Trump think they can just do whatever the hell they want with women's bodies. 47% of the workforce is women, yet women still do the vast majority of housework, cooking and child care. Men are not the oppressed victims of estrogen-stoked rapine and plunder.

But back to the movie. The guys whining about it are oblivious: the film is about an island full of Amazons. That means that it only has women on it. The whole conceit of the movie is that there's a place where there are only women, with no petty little wankers constantly spewing misogynistic hatred about how mean women are to them.

Screening this film to a female audience is a tip of the hat to its basic conceit.

If these guys want to go see a movie with just men, they can go to any theater showing gay porn.

Oh, wait. That would mean...