Warning: The following contains substantiated rumour, inuendo, gossip, and no substanative facts whatsoever (aka trying not to cause the ineveitable conservative tapping into their inner rage, flying off the handle at yours truly, and accusing me of being a communist)But........
An avid reader of Notes From the Front just sent me this email (the names have been changed to protect the innocent...)
Jill (my wife) says that it is a widespread rumor that Michelle Bachmann is having an affair with someone in Washington, apparently another congressman. One of Jill's acquaintances observed Bachmann playing footsie with some guy in a meeting, and upon further discussion with those in the know learned that it's common knowledge she is having an affair.
I guess when Bush rejected her advances she went on to fry other fish.
And apparently her husband likes to watch, since she would never do anything without him telling her to do it.
Could it be true? Well, I know this is tabloid stuff but this is the closest I will EVER get to going Paris Hilton on all y'all's asses. I have scanned the Internet and found nothing. Perhaps Notes From The Front will be the first to break this story!!!
10 comments:
"tapping into their inner rage, flying off the handle at yours truly"
From what I have read on here, that is also known as asking you for proof or evidence of the charges you make on here.
Well, as far as legislators go, she's probably one of the better looking ones.
"asking you for proof or evidence of the charges you make on here"
I think Mark has presented plenty of evidence and proof to show what is quite obvious. The problem is not with the messenger but certain receivers. Perhaps a tune up is required?
Simply saying that something is obvious, doesn't make it so. If you're going to claim the moon is made of swiss cheese, you should be able to produce a modicum of evidence.
Not really, dave. Because your side does a pretty good job of twisting anything to the point of where everything is questioned.
Sometimes even outright lying as was the case with the Graem Frost. The right does a great job of "eliminating" evidence.
I'll take that as a 'no'; you don't want to provide any evidence to these outlandish claims. ...thought as much.
I learned in the 1990's that this is their private life and it doesn't have anything to do with how well they do their job.
To a certain extent, that's true but since people like Michelle Bachman prop themselves up to be the official mouthpiece of morality and get elected on that premise, it very disingenous, don't you think?
Disingenous, yes. Hypocritical on your part to actually point out and even care if she is having an affair? Yes.
Being morally hypocritical generally only works politically against the right; because one must possess morals in the first place.
Post a Comment