GD also missed my point. It would be completely false to say that the president is destroying the economy, given these latest numbers.
I do like the in the bubble links, though. How long will it be before it bursts? Further, are you guys actually rooting for America to fail? That's sure what it sounds like.
The number of jobs was considered well below what was expected - so why is the unemployment rate dropping M? You should be able to answer that without resorting to Mankiw.
Now, can you explain why even though job growth is anemic, the unemployment rate went down? I think you can, but because you can't spin it as good news for your Messiah you'll just ignore it.
Very childish and very dishonest. Doesn't it bother you that no one expects better from you?
Pointless to add this, but then the whole point of this blog is the pointlessness of it all. Even though that isn't intentional - which makes it even funnier.
11 comments:
As a teacher, you should understand the concept of grading on a curve
I think you missed my point.
Weekly hours were down a tenth and hourly earnings were off 2 cents. If you look at the average weekly earnings loss ($3.09) and multiply it by the total employed (145,113,000) then divide by the average weekly earnings the imputed job loss due to hourly earnings and hour declines is 543,573, massively dwarfing the so-called "gains."
GD also missed my point. It would be completely false to say that the president is destroying the economy, given these latest numbers.
I do like the in the bubble links, though. How long will it be before it bursts? Further, are you guys actually rooting for America to fail? That's sure what it sounds like.
How many of those jobs are part time jobs Markadelphia?
The number of jobs was considered well below what was expected - so why is the unemployment rate dropping M? You should be able to answer that without resorting to Mankiw.
Is the president destroying the economy-yes or no?
Is the president destroying the economy-yes or no?
Childish and dishonest.
The answer would be no, juris. He is not. So the Right needs to stop being childish and dishonest and saying that he is destroying the economy.
The answer would be no
Then why did you ask?
Now, can you explain why even though job growth is anemic, the unemployment rate went down? I think you can, but because you can't spin it as good news for your Messiah you'll just ignore it.
Very childish and very dishonest. Doesn't it bother you that no one expects better from you?
Pointless to add this, but then the whole point of this blog is the pointlessness of it all. Even though that isn't intentional - which makes it even funnier.
Post a Comment