Contributors

Saturday, May 15, 2010

Good or Bad?

In what is yet another example of Reaganesque behavior, President Obama is rallying to bring back the line item veto. I doubt he has a chance of getting it but at least he is making an effort. This is part of his overall strategy, through his bipartisan commission of lawmakers and economic experts, to produce a plan to reduce red ink.

Of course, this blows a hole in the Cult's theory that Obama is rampaging spender. In reality, it's Congress that is the rampaging spender and controls the power of the purse strings. Fisk any DC or politico web sites and you will hear rumbling of nerves on Capitol Hill. What will he want to cut? Will it be my shit?

That's basically the problem and it's an across-the-board red and blue issue. No one wants their little piece of the pie to be taken away. At this point, we really don't have a choice. We do have to cut spending to reduce our debt. While I don't think we are going to end up like Greece, we do need to be on more solid economic ground.

I'm predicting a showdown between Congress and Obama after the election. I think it's going to surprise a lot of people and I can't wait.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hold on there brother. Did you just say:

At this point, we really don't have a choice. We do have to cut spending to reduce our debt.

What?
Why?
No choice? Why not?

This seems to contradict your previous post regarding Greece. I hate to put your words in your mouth, but are you saying that with the deficits currently stretching out in perpetuity, we may someday go broke?

dw

Mark Ward said...

See my post above.

Anonymous said...

Nah. It's not your post, it is a cut-n-paste of someone else's post. Did you just say that these United States may go broke?

dw

juris imprudent said...

Obama pulling a classic Reagan - talking up a point there is no chance in hell that he can ever pull off.

Nerves? More like nervous laughter that the great constitutional scholar in the White House thinks he can do this without an amendment to the Constitution.

But hey, after the insurance mandate in the great HCRA, why not - it isn't like the Constitution matters or anything.