It wasn't about Bin Laden. It was never about Bin Laden. It has always been about toppling Saddam so junior could do what daddy couldn't, getting Iraqi oil and keeping America in a perpetual state of war.
Bin Laden (assuming he's even still alive) is a Saudi, sure he's a Black Sheep Saudi, but if the royal family really wanted Osama dead, they would have killed him long ago. The Saudis are very close to the Bush family, ergo, America makes a good show of going after the terrorists, but mission success is officially denied.
No, you're the polarized ones. You are dogmatists to whom the Kool Aide tastes like Merlot. You are the ones who have no meaning or purpose without an imaginary enemy, dredged up from the fetid, oozing swamps of your own ignorance and prejudice, inexpertly slapped into a vaguely human form, and hastily labeled with the insult of the moment; Liberal, socialist, atheist. Any label will do, as long as it's easy to understand and hate.
But if you want to talk about paranoia, what does it say about someone who hasn't the stones to use even a phony internet handle on their posts? If you want people to take you seriously, you need an identity and to cobble together something more than links to Faux News and disjointed, cloudy non sequiturs.
"No, you're the polarized ones. You are dogmatists to whom the Kool Aide tastes like Merlot. You are the ones who have no meaning or purpose without an imaginary enemy, dredged up from the fetid, oozing swamps of your own ignorance and prejudice, inexpertly slapped into a vaguely human form, and hastily labeled with the insult of the moment; Liberal, socialist, atheist. Any label will do, as long as it's easy to understand and hate. "
Ahh, yes. There's that again. So, tell me, how many conversations on this blog have you run away from where a "conservative" showed up? Oh yeah! All of them! And Mark and all of you, too. So, please, cut the shit.
"If you want people to take you seriously, you need an identity and to cobble together something more than links to Faux News and disjointed, cloudy non sequiturs."
Mm. This again. "I don't have to take you seriously because you won't put a handle on what you do." Last time it was Dick. Now it's you. That's cute, too - the little Fox News references and turning it into "Faux."
Here's the thing, and I want you to understand this:
Mark and pieces of shit like you who don't have the intellectual honesty or capacity to stand behind the bullshit you spew have not garnered the credibility or respect for me to bother putting a name on this cesspool of idiocy.
Seriously? You're sitting on Mark's blog of all places and trying to claim polarity and paranoia for "the other side?"
You are dogmatists to whom the Kool Aide tastes like Merlot. You are the ones who have no meaning or purpose without an imaginary enemy, dredged up from the fetid, oozing swamps of your own ignorance and prejudice, inexpertly slapped into a vaguely human form, and hastily labeled with the insult of the moment; Liberal, socialist, atheist. Any label will do, as long as it's easy to understand and hate.
But of course, there's obviously no labeling or hatred going on there, huh?
5 comments:
It wasn't about Bin Laden. It was never about Bin Laden. It has always been about toppling Saddam so junior could do what daddy couldn't, getting Iraqi oil and keeping America in a perpetual state of war.
Bin Laden (assuming he's even still alive) is a Saudi, sure he's a Black Sheep Saudi, but if the royal family really wanted Osama dead, they would have killed him long ago. The Saudis are very close to the Bush family, ergo, America makes a good show of going after the terrorists, but mission success is officially denied.
"but if the royal family really wanted Osama dead, they would have killed him long ago"
Yeah, and *we're* the paranoid ones...
"Yeah, and *we're* the paranoid ones..."
No, you're the polarized ones. You are dogmatists to whom the Kool Aide tastes like Merlot. You are the ones who have no meaning or purpose without an imaginary enemy, dredged up from the fetid, oozing swamps of your own ignorance and prejudice, inexpertly slapped into a vaguely human form, and hastily labeled with the insult of the moment; Liberal, socialist, atheist. Any label will do, as long as it's easy to understand and hate.
But if you want to talk about paranoia, what does it say about someone who hasn't the stones to use even a phony internet handle on their posts? If you want people to take you seriously, you need an identity and to cobble together something more than links to Faux News and disjointed, cloudy non sequiturs.
"No, you're the polarized ones. You are dogmatists to whom the Kool Aide tastes like Merlot. You are the ones who have no meaning or purpose without an imaginary enemy, dredged up from the fetid, oozing swamps of your own ignorance and prejudice, inexpertly slapped into a vaguely human form, and hastily labeled with the insult of the moment; Liberal, socialist, atheist. Any label will do, as long as it's easy to understand and hate. "
Ahh, yes. There's that again. So, tell me, how many conversations on this blog have you run away from where a "conservative" showed up? Oh yeah! All of them! And Mark and all of you, too. So, please, cut the shit.
"If you want people to take you seriously, you need an identity and to cobble together something more than links to Faux News and disjointed, cloudy non sequiturs."
Mm. This again. "I don't have to take you seriously because you won't put a handle on what you do." Last time it was Dick. Now it's you. That's cute, too - the little Fox News references and turning it into "Faux."
Here's the thing, and I want you to understand this:
Mark and pieces of shit like you who don't have the intellectual honesty or capacity to stand behind the bullshit you spew have not garnered the credibility or respect for me to bother putting a name on this cesspool of idiocy.
Seriously? You're sitting on Mark's blog of all places and trying to claim polarity and paranoia for "the other side?"
You are dogmatists to whom the Kool Aide tastes like Merlot. You are the ones who have no meaning or purpose without an imaginary enemy, dredged up from the fetid, oozing swamps of your own ignorance and prejudice, inexpertly slapped into a vaguely human form, and hastily labeled with the insult of the moment; Liberal, socialist, atheist. Any label will do, as long as it's easy to understand and hate.
But of course, there's obviously no labeling or hatred going on there, huh?
Post a Comment