Contributors

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

The Sowell Reflex

I was reminiscing recently about my long conversation over Facebook with Reverend Jim last spring. Our discussion on Thomas Sowell's Conflict of Visions has continued to resonate with me in an enormously frustrating way and I've finally figured out why.

I hadn't read Sowell's book since the late 80s so I dug out my old copy and re-read parts of it. As I chuckled at his insistence that the "constrained vision" relies on empirical evidence (see: The Economic Collapse of 2008 or how I learned to stop worrying and worship the free market), I realized that he was very sadly arguing this point (via Asimov):

My ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.

In essence, the entire book is one gigantic #3-Projection/Flipping.

The fact is that most liberals do not look at human nature as being inherently good. This is a complete fucking straw man. In reality, most liberals (including myself) look at ALL of the ways human nature is colored. We start as blank slates and develop based on number of factors. Part of it is genetic...part of it is how we are socialized...how we interact with the people in our lives (family, friends, co-workers)...part of it is how we function within the institutional framework of our society. There is a mountain of empirical evidence that supports human development in each of these areas.

But Sowell and his followers don't want to look at this evidence. Instead, they jump immediately to dividing people into two camps: those that are naively optimistic and those who know how the world really works. Yeah...no bias there. Worse, his definition of "how the world works" (i.e. the constrained vision) is equally as ignorant as those who believe in utopias. I've talked about this before...the libertarian utopia is just as ridiculous as the socialist one.

The result of all of this is what I am now calling The Sowell Reflex, a condition that presents itself quite regularly these days in many political discussions. It's happened to me so many times in the last couple of years that I chuckle when his name (predictably) comes up. More often than not, as soon as a person questions the breadth of intelligence of ideologically right folks, Sowell is quickly mentioned as a shield and the "silly liberals" are told to go home with their tail between their legs. Yet, upon closer inspection, one can easily see that this is just another dodge that is summed up simply as this:

The Sowell Reflex is one gigantic excuse for continued and willful ignorance.

7 comments:

juris imprudent said...

You think Sowell is ignorant and you are smarter than him, is that what you just claimed?

Mark Ward said...

Yes, I do think Sowell is ignorant but it is willfully so. That's his ideology and (sadly) many others' as well.

No, I don't think I am smarter than him but remember, I am a big fan of Gardner's multiple intelligences so no one is "smarter" than anyone else.

juris imprudent said...

Let me be clear - you are an idiot.

juris imprudent said...

I had a post to elaborate on my summary comment above, but it got eaten. I don't feel like reconstructing it, so instead, I offer a glimpse into the stupidity that the proprietors of this site appear to believe is "good government"...

Uncertainty, regulation, etc. in the we had to pass this bill to know what was in it.

A. Noni Mouse said...

This is a complete fucking straw man.

Talk about huge balls of brass!! Especially in light of the seven huge "f------ straw men" in your previous post; not to mention your constant use of that fallacy. ("Voices in your head" is just a funky way to say "straw man fallacy.") Do you need one of these to carry those cojones around?

A. Noni Mouse said...

Especially in light of the seven…

Correction: eight. I forgot about the one about conservatives being fickle.

juris imprudent said...

Here is an interesting take on the supposed interdependence of the financial sector.