Contributors

Monday, March 26, 2012

1 comment:

juris imprudent said...

That is because you are retiring on someone elses money - not what you set aside for yourself. No, there isn't any risk in that, particularly when the beneficiaries are more likely to vote (and preserve what they've got) than are those who are paying the freight.

It certainly does strike me as odd though that such a regressive scheme should be the object of such devotion amongst putative progressives.