Contributors

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Yep, Pretty Much.

Before there was Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, there was The Onion.

Nation Once Again Comes Under Sway Of Pink-Faced Half-Wit

This particular pink-faced half-wit is at the height of his persuasive powers," Ellington said of the bloated, hateful multimillionaire. "By exploiting citizens' greatest anxieties during an uncertain time in our nation's history, the pink-faced half-wit has been able to promote his own vain, avaricious self-interests under the guise of standing up for the very disenfranchised people whom he himself is fleecing.

I don't think I've read a more accurate assessment of the machine that drives the GOP.

And why do I keep talking about the "party out of power?"

According to scholars, pink-faced half-wits have had remarkable staying power throughout history despite their outlandish, easily debunked claims, shameless self-promotion, and complete lack of credentials. More often than not, experts said, these pasty, shallow dullards skillfully manage to control debate on the most important social and political topics of the day.

That's why.

Don't think for a moment, though, that The Onion is playing favorites.

In recent years, there has been a new breed of equally vociferous, foaming morons who espouse opposing viewpoints but use identical tactics: the prime example being that pink-faced Michael Moore half-wit.

What's amazing to me is how similar the mouth foamers are even if they are at ideologically opposites. Compare any left wing blog to a right wing one. They are basically the same. They use the same language, the same insults, suffer completely from cognitive dissonance, and claim "the truth."

Sadly and more importantly, many of these people have lives which are not very fulfilling for a number of reasons. Perhaps they are being hit by tough economic times or aren't very socially comfortable. It's probably a combination of both. So, they feed upon this sickening arena that has been slowly raised to onyx level importance and feel better about their lives.

I suspect, though, that it is an empty feeling. And, like many addicts, they keep going back to sate themselves with a tool (pink faced half wits) that will never be enough. Meaningful change is never going to occur in this country as long as our perception of these important social and political are warped to fill this pathetic urge.

In the final analysis, the cause of all of this is simple. The real pink faced half wits are the ones we see in the mirror every morning.

7 comments:

juris imprudent said...

What's amazing to me is how similar the mouth foamers are even if they are at ideologically opposites.

Wait just a fuckin' minute. Are you agreeing that Michael Moore is a mouth-foamer now?

What happened to his lies are meant in a good way/cause?

What happened to his mistakes didn't detract from his message?

Is this some sea change in your view of Michael Moore, or are you just having a moment of temporary sanity?

sw said...

Why is your party having steven colbert testify in character today markadelphia? What are they tryng to distract the people from seeing?

Mark Ward said...

Juris, in a word...yes. I believe I have stated in the past that he demonizes the word "capitalism" as much as the GOP et al demonize "socialism." Neither are very accurate with their assessments. While I agree with Moore on many issues, that doesn't make him or me "right." I do have to check myself for bias of which there is plenty.

It's not that his lies are meant in a good way. It's that he leaves out facts. That is a form of lying that is different from Palin's death panels. If I had to choose, I'd find his to be preferable. They don't play to the fear and anger as much as the complete lies of the current form of the GOP.

Honestly where Moore really fails is taking into account successful money makers like Bill Gates or Warren Buffet, for example, who have used their wealth in such a positive way that it has affected real change in a number of areas.

juris imprudent said...

I ask an "or" question and you reply

Juris, in a word...yes.

Classic M, absolutely classic.

oojc said...

Huh? You asked

"Are you agreeing that Michael Moore is a mouth-foamer now?"

He answered yes. How is that an "or" question?

juris imprudent said...

Sorry oojc I was referring to my last question. The first three were just set ups to that.

I mean, do I really need to mention all of M's qualifying of his opinion? The Onion calls out Moore as a mouth-foamer - which M agrees with... sorta. Cause M still agrees with most of what Moore has to say.

Damn Teabaggers said...

The scary part is that's a 100% accurate answer:

Juris: Is this some sea change in your view of Michael Moore, or are you just having a moment of temporary sanity?

Markadelphia: Juris, in a word...yes.

Juris, you've been asking him to stick with factual answers for a long, long time. Be careful what you wish for.