Contributors

Monday, April 22, 2013

Going Forward

It's hard to imagine where the gun safety movement is going to go from here. I've heard many people say to me, "If 20 dead elementary school children doesn't change our nation's gun laws, what will?" I certainly can sympathize with this sentiment.

What has to happen now is out of the box thinking. As I have said previously, bringing a knife to a gun fight never works and the families of the victims of the various shootings that showed up in DC these last two weeks didn't even bring that. They don't understand the nature of what stands in their way. Essentially, it is two distinct groups of people

First you have the gun lobby and the gun manufacturers. They don't give a shit about the 2nd amendment or possible futures in which an American Hitler or Stalin takes over. They care about one thing: money. Their livelihood is being threatened and they are going to do anything to prevent from happening. These people are fucking scumbags who peddle fear and death and they should be exposed as such. Think about how much money they have made since the president took office. Think about how much money has been made since Newtown. So many gun owners rushed to their local gun store because of a fear that ended up being nothing. They have their sheep and they know how to manipulate them.

The second group of people are the paranoid pyschotics that do think Democrats, proggressives and any to the left of the one yard line on the right side of the field is coming to get their guns and send them to re-education camps. These are the same people who sneer at frightened children who write to the president because they are scared, only to be later derisively called props. Or taunt the families of the victims and say things like, "But it must be for the children.." In so many ways, these people are actually worse than the gun lobby and gun manufacturers. The good news is that most of these people are over the age of 40 so time will do its thing in some respects.

Now,there is no earthly way to reach the second group. They are fucking gone into a never, never world of plots and fantasies so profoundly fictitious that it leaves me...even me...completely speechless. So, the attention should be on the first group. And that means one thing. We have to go after the money. The question is...how do we do that?

One idea I had recently was to go in the opposite direction. Rather than try and ban certain types of guns or limit ammo clips, why not simply give away free guns? The federal government could offer free weapons to any citizen who would pass a background check and go through the appropriate training and regular mental health checks. That would also really piss off the anti government spending crowd as they are usually the same demographic as the pro gun crowd. And, to get around the issue of buying the guns from the gun manufacturers, the government could just make their own guns. There are probably plenty of people who could use the work. Heck, that would solve the unemployment problem!

The other idea I had was a PR campaign based on what happened with smoking. If you start to pull together all the various groups that are adversely affected by gun violence, you could really start to change public opinion. These days, smoking is really looked upon like a giant fart that just hangs in the air and won't go away. Lock a bunch of ad guys in a room for a couple of weeks and there is no doubt in my mind that they could eviscerate the gun lobby. You could put together ads with the audio being comprised of the usual rhetoric from the pro gun folks and the video showing shootings, the aftermath, and victims families. The public needs to see this contrast.

Both of these ideas may seem out there but that's what it's going to take. Of course, there is something else that I haven't mentioned because it's not so much of an idea as it is a prediction, which would make both of my ideas moot. If you take a look at how change happens in this country, it only occurs when the right people are adversely affected by whatever issue is on the hot seat. Gay rights, for example, wasn't important until enough parents had children that came out and then that was pretty much fucking that. When it becomes personal, that's when the real change happens.

Right now, there is someone out there..or several someones...that sooner or later is going to be adversely affected by gun violence. I don't who they are or where they live but I do know that they will start a wave that will finally end all this nonsense. This person will likely be someone who arises out of the "pro-gun" crowd and will initially be labeled a "traitor." This same person or people will understand that you don't bring less than a knife or less to a gun fight. They'll know exactly what to do and they will fucking bury the NRA, the rest of the gun lobby, and the pro gun crowd up to their necks.

He or she won't take away their guns nor will they change the second amendment in any way. They will simply expose the anger, hatred, fear, and paranoia for all to see. And then we can finally put a serious dent in the already declining world of violent crime.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

So many gun owners rushed to their local gun store because of a fear that ended up being nothing.


Aparently you didn't bother reading it the first time.

Mark Ward said...

What actually happened in reality, GD? Not the fictional world of a right wing blog. Did anything result from either the president being elected, re-elected or the Newtown tragedy?

Anonymous said...

Does Obama have to be physically present at my door demanding I turn over my guns for you to consider him to be 'comin' to get 'im'?

Anonymous said...

It's hard to imagine where the gun safety movement is going to go from here.

'Gun Safety Movement'? Interesting definition you got there.

What actually happened in reality, GD?

I guess ends justify the means and if the ends don't come, it never happened and doesn't exist. Wow, that was amazingly stupid, M.

Essentially, it is two distinct groups of people

Well, more stupid and ignorant rants. Man, you just can't get it right even after being given answers. What does that say about you?

Mark Ward said...

I guess I have to answer the question for you, GD. Since the president has taken office, there has only been one change to federal gun law. You can now carry a loaded weapon in national parks and on trains.

That's it.

Anonymous said...

You really are an idiot.


Hypothetical (shame I have to specify that)

You shoot at me.

If you miss, did you still attempt to kill me?


You stab a knife at me.

If I take the knife away, was that still an attempt to kill me?


Democrats attempt to pass gun restriction laws.

If they are defeated, DID THEY NOT STILL TRY TO DO WHAT YOU ARE NOW CLAIMING TO BE NOTHING?


Just because an attempt was not successful either through incompetence or successful defense DOES NOT MEAN THE ATTEMPT NEVER HAPPENED.


This statement:

a fear that ended up being nothing.

And this one:

Did anything result

Can both be answered by showing the attempt was made.

Mark Ward said...

So, wait, Democrats are trying to kill or stab you now? I suppose that makes sense.

Democrats attempt to pass gun restriction laws.

False. There were no gun restrictions in Manchin-Toomey. Zero. Further, they did not attempt anything until after Newtown which was the president's second term. And even if there ever was a ban on assault weapons or ammo clips, you would have been grandfathered in. So, no, no restrictions.

Wasn't it you that told me that even fully automatic weapons are available if you want to jump through some hoops?

Anonymous said...

Hypothetical (shame I have to specify that)


I specify up front and still YOU CAN'T FUCKING UNDERSTAND THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE.

Anonymous said...

There were no gun restrictions in Manchin-Toomey

And you're the idiot. MT was not the only bill voted on, nor was it the only bill introduced.


they did not attempt anything until after Newtown


History did not begin when BO was elected.


even if there ever was a ban on assault weapons or ammo clips, you would have been grandfathered in

Would have? Really? You sure? Did you read the text of every introduced bill? You have not seen congressmen call for outright confiscation of all arms?

And, SO FUCKING WHAT? Grandfathered? LIKE I WOULD BE APPEASED TO KEEP MY STUFF AND SELL OUT MY FELLOW COUNTRYMEN AND FUTURE GENERATIONS.

As I said before, unlike you I care for all rights, not just the ones I like.

Mark Ward said...

I specify up front

Yeah, I realized that. I skipped to the part where Freud would have a field day:)

Did you read the text of every introduced bill?

I did read the entire text of Manchin-Toomey. It was only 40 pages or so. Did you?

Larry said...

If you read it like you read people's comments here -- then, no, you didn't read it. You skimmed it and jumped to conclusions.

Juris Imprudent said...

So, wait, Democrats are trying to kill or stab you now?

Do you even fool yourself attempting to appear that stupid? I mean honestly, I don't believe you are that stupid - that you just play stupid like a possum plays dead.

Amirite?

Larry said...

It's the "I'm a Deliberate Fuckwit" defensive move of the Lame-Brained Progressive Possum. Right before he shits and vomits on himself to make himself less palatable. Fortunately, it's only verbal, but the images remain ... those horrible images of a creature utterly without shame or honor, who will again be yapping at your heels and nipping at your ankles as soon as you turn your back.

Juris Imprudent said...

Daaaaaaamn Larry.

So, I go out in the backyard one night a few years back with my dogs just going nuts. There on the top of the fence was a big old nasty possum. I collar the dogs and haul them inside and go grab the baseball bat I keep just inside from the front door. I go out with flashlight and bat and figure I'll prod the possum into moving on. Stupid thing sits there on the fence after a couple of pushes and just hisses at me. Okay, we can do this another way if you insist and I pull the bat back and give it a home run swing.

I wonder if the average progressive is going to require the same dissuasion?