We haven't heard much from the Cliven Bundy standoff of late so I thought I would point out a few recent headlines. First we have this:
Cliven Bundy standoff: Locals want armed militia out, lawmaker says
I don't blame them. Amusing that people from out of state (what happened to state's rights?) are there to support Bundy.
We also have this:
One month later, Cliven Bundy, militia, residents face an uneasy coexistence
Here's an idea, federal government. Go and arrest Clive Bundy. He broke the law and has the bizarre idea (seemingly rooted in communism) that the land he grazes his cattle on is everyone's land. If anyone shoots at you, shoot back because that's what known as an armed insurrection. Honestly, I don't think they will because at their very heart, they are a bunch of fucking cowards who like to play guns.
2 comments:
Amusing that people from out of state (what happened to state's rights?)
What is that even supposed to mean? The 'fight' is between Bundy and the BLM; there isn't any aspect of Nevada sovereignty involved (other than I suppose you could argue that NV should have control of the public land inside its boundaries and not the Feds). But I don't think that is what you are getting at.
If anyone shoots at you, shoot back because that's what known as an armed insurrection.
That's just fucking perfect. The Feds actually showed good sense by letting the situation cool down and you want them to go in guns-a-blazin' (because of course there isn't any chance of your cowardly ass getting shot). You are just as brave with someone else's life as you are generous with other people's money.
Haven't you argued repeatedly that 'men with guns' won't come to your house?
Post a Comment