Contributors

Friday, October 31, 2008

Really?

A couple of weeks back, some conservative commenters directed me to a story about Ashwin Madia campaign workers taking down Erik Pauslen yard signs. It seems there was a dispute over whether the property was public or private so it may or may not have been out of line.

There's also been a lot of talk recently in comments about how Democrats are just as bad as Republicans when it comes to playing dirty. That may have been true at one time in our country's history...in fact, I would say that Democrats were dirtier on a multitude of levels for a much longer period of time...but it is not true today. The Republicans, in their current form, are complete scumbags.

Take a look at this story from KARE 11. A recent attack ad (see: Willie Horton) against Aswhin Madia show that his skin was purposefully darkened to make him look....what?....more evil? Because people with darker skin are more evil?

Aswhin Madia does have darker skin, being the son of immigrants from India, but what does it say about a party that wants to exaggerate that?

Of course, I could call it racist but the right has been very successful at being able to deflect accusations of racism combining "Who? Me?" faux innocence with their usual fervent vitriol.

Whatever you want to call it, that's a pretty far cry from lawn sign tom foolery.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Yeah, that’s pretty shady…ha ha…sorry, too easy a pun.

So your contention is that opposing camps should use the best possible picture of their opponent? By this, I assume that USA Today adjusting Condi Rice’s picture to make cat eyes or Bush ads that morph into Adolph Hitler or just the simple, quick snapshots that have the opponent with their eyes closed or some other less than perfect profile and then shown in black & white to make them look as bad as possible; those are all despicable. Right? Right??

Mark Ward said...

I think all the goofy photos of Franken are fair game like the ones Coleman has been using. There are some ads with goofy photos of Ash too. But the purposeful darkening...no...that is too far.

Who is running the ads where Bush morphs into Hitler? Have a YouTube link?

Shannipots said...

I like your use of the term "tom foolery."

Anonymous said...

Aswhin Madia does have darker skin, being the son of immigrants from India, but what does it say about a party that wants to exaggerate that?

Funny, so does Bobby Jindal, the Republican governor of Louisiana.

Mark Ward said...

Interesting you mention Jindal, juris. He will be the subject of a future post.

I think Jindal is the future of the Republican Party. I disagree with him on many issues but he would be an example of how the Republican Party could right itself again with someone who has a deep intellect and an abundance of compassion.