Contributors

Saturday, January 05, 2013

A Collection of Voices In My Head

I've heard so many "voices in my head" of late. What are they saying these days?

“The numbers — at some point it’s got to catch up or else we’re all going to die,” said Chris Chocola, head of the anti-tax Club for Growth.

Cue the boiling pit of sewage!

Obama you stupid sand nigger get off my tv. Your just making the families hurt and miss their kids more and I want to watch football 

The above is one tweet of many. Make sure you read all of the comments from the non-Republican, non-racists.

And what happens when you hug the president and you are a registered Republican?

But the attention wasn't all positive. Van Duzer, a registered Republican, had voted for Obama in the last election and said he did again in November. That brought out the worst in anti-Obama zealots, who called in bomb threats, sent him hate mail with death threats, and brought out a level of vitriol Van Duzer said he had never witnessed. Some tried to organize a boycott of his restaurant and bombarded Yelp!, the restaurant review website, with thousands of one-star reviews from first-time visitors to the site.

It must be the left wing media's fault! Where's Katie Couric?!??

12 comments:

Juris Imprudent said...

That voices-in-your-head concept is a real challenge, isn't it?

Anonymous said...

Inconceivable.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D58LpHBnvsI

Mark Ward said...

Apparently it is, juris, as all of you regular commenters have said similar things to at least one of these three things.

Anonymous said...

Find a fucking sand nigger comment on this blog you lying weasel.

Juris Imprudent said...

M really? Quote me with anything like what was said. You won't find anything even close.

THAT is the fucking voice in your head you dumb, lying motherfucker. You don't listen to what I say and keep trying to shove other peoples words into my mouth. I don't fucking like it, and honest to gawd I'd bitchslap from here to Thursday if you were within reach.

Dishonest fucking shithead.

Anonymous said...

It would be funny if it weren't so incredibly sad.

Mark sets out to prove that the Voices In His Head™ are real, yet all he winds up doing is demonstrating precisely what the Voices In His Head™ are and why we call him out on them.

Putting words in someone else's mouth—as Mark tried to do to us right here and does so often that it earned the name "Voices In His Head"—is a specific example of the Straw Man logical fallacy.

fallacy

1. a deceptive, misleading, or false notion, belief, etc.

2. a misleading or unsound argument.

3. deceptive, misleading, or false nature; erroneousness.

4. Logic. any of various types of erroneous reasoning that render arguments logically unsound.

5. Obsolete, deception.

In other words, every time Mark argues with the Voices In His Head™, his use of this fallacy means he does not have a valid argument, thus conceding that his claim is FALSE, deceptive, unsound, misleading, and/or erroneous. (Though he would never openly admit that.)

Remember "verbatim"? I wonder if he ever figured out what that word actually means…

Juris Imprudent said...

Allow me to quote myself from another thread...

"Granted, you do not advocate for banning all guns, but your blog-mate did as do many others. Those same people claim that banning some is a step on the way to banning them all - even if you don't. Do you notice here that I hear what you argue rather than constructing a voice in my head labeled Markadelphia and arguing with it. The problem with your argument of banning some is two-fold: 1) it has no logical basis or limit, and 2) it encourages those who wish to ban all. If you want to persuade people to only ban some - spend your time arguing with those who want to ban them all about why that is a very bad idea (and unlikely to ever happen, i.e. manage their fantasies)."

Of course M had no response to any of that. He was too busy creating a voice in his head conversation to actually read and comprehend what I bothered to write.

Nor can he state what a background check on Nancy Lanza would've turned up that would've DQ'ed her gun purchases. Yet he retardedly insists that it will.

Juris Imprudent said...

Hey asshole, you're ignoring this.

Mark Ward said...

Notice, GD, I said "similar things to at least one of these three things."

Haplo9 has said that black culture doesn't reward academic achievement. That's a racial thing similar to these comments.

All of you have said that the country is going to be destroyed because of our spending...hysterical reactions similar to this one.

And you whine constantly about "real" conservatives and have engaged in internet shenanigans (like you are doing here:)) similar to what Van Duzer experienced.

Juris Imprudent said...

More voices in your head.

Too bad you can't actually engage with real people.

Anonymous said...

And yet he continues to argue against someone other than actual people here.

Fallacy: unsound, erroneous, misleading, deceptive, FALSE.

Anonymous said...

Notice, GD, I said "similar things to at least one of these three things."

Yes I did notice. Notice I said 'weasel'.

Let me point you to the wikipedia enty of weasel word:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weasel_word

"words and phrases aimed at creating an impression that something specific and meaningful has been said, when in fact only a vague or ambiguous claim, or even a refutation has been communicated.

Destroyed? Citation.


And, does an observation of black culture equal 'sand nigger'? Really? You even consider that a close one? I guess the next time you talk about 'old white guys' what you must really mean is 'fascist motherfuckers' right? At least be consistent Mark.