Contributors

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Incompetents and Crazies

Last week an armed security guard hired in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook shootings forgot his gun in the bathroom of a Kindergarten through eighth grade charter school in Michigan. The gun was unloaded, and was quickly found. The guy was a retired weapons instructor.

Not long ago I was wondering if it really made sense to hire armed geezers with slow reflexes, lousy vision and bad hearing to protect our schools. I now have to add "forgetful" to the list of belittling descriptors.

Yeah, I know. Accidents happen. No harm, no foul. But a lot of accidents seem to happen with guns. Last Saturday was "Gun Appreciation Day," and five people were accidentally shot at gun shows in three different states. That same day a guy in a Texas Walmart shot himself when a gun in his pocket went off, a six-year-old Ohio girl shot herself in the face with her dad's gun, a 14-year-old Georgia boy shot his brother with his mom's gun, and on and on and on.

At this point gun advocates point out that a lot of people die in car accidents as well. It's true. We've got a stretch of freeway near our house that's constantly clogged with traffic and there are always accidents. But if the NRA ran the Department of Transportation their solution would be raise the speed limit and put more cars with bigger engines on the freeway.

The fact is, we have taken significant steps to make cars safer over the years. We require licensing of all drivers and all cars. We require seat belts, air bags and crumple zones in new cars. We put up stoplights, reconstruct intersections to make them safer, erect collapsible barriers on the roads to lessen the impact when accidents do occur.

The result is that per-capita traffic deaths have been declining for years, but gun deaths have been going up, though they've stabilized somewhat in recent years because of a general decline in violence. Gun suicides have continued to climb, however.

The simple truth is, the more people that have guns, the more accidents there will be. To prevent that we need to use technology to make guns less accident prone and to prevent them from being fired if dropped or when kids get hold of them. We also have to keep loaded weapons out of places where they just don't belong, like Walmart, bars, schools, colleges and churches.

And we have to keep them out of the hands of people who just shouldn't have them. People like Christian Philip Oberender.

Oberender murdered his mother with a shotgun in 1995, when he was 14. He got out a while back, and he was just arrested for amassing an illegal arsenal of weapons, including an AK-47, a Desert Eagle and a Thompson submachine gun.

Now, this guy is a real wackjob. In a letter to his dead mother he wrote:
I think about killing all the time. Why god do I feel like this? The monster want to hurt people. Guns are too fast. The monster want it to be slow and painful. There is so much pain in my heart and soul. Me want other to feel it.
How did he get these weapons? He applied for a gun permit, but swapped his first and middle names on the application. Recent changes in Minnesota law require all gun permits to be automatically granted within seven days. Police just don't have the time to investigate all applications in that amount of time.

It's only random chance that Oberender was caught before he copycatted Sandy Hook, which he'd mentioned on his Facebook page along with a picture of his guns. Sheriff Jim Olson spotted Oberender's name on a shift report. Olson happened to be the detective who caught the Oberender murder case 18 years ago.

The NRA has been working diligently for decades to gut gun licensing laws, making it trivial for criminals, crazies and terrorists to get hold of military grade weapons and making it hard for law enforcement to catch them. Our gun permitting process needs to completely revamped. It needs to be nationwide, and include criminal and mental health history, fingerprints, photos, face recognition and previous gun and ammo purchases. This will allow police to quickly investigate gun permit applications in the time frame dictated by the NRA's desires for instant gratification.

If the NRA is going to insist on a right to buy guns on demand, the rest of us have the right to keep them out of the hands of crazies, criminals and incompetents.

4 comments:

Mark Ward said...

The Oberender story was proof positive that our current system is flawed. I'm very relieved that someone got him before he did any damage. Once again, another young white man with mental problems and whole lot of guns. This is where the mental health aspect of the president's plan comes into play. What is it about this demographic that leads to spree shootings?

Further, why in the fuck is the gun lobby now against universal background checks and/or improving the current system of registration?

Juris Imprudent said...

I believe the NRA does not oppose universal background checks.

I oppose them because the federal govt does not have the constitutional authority to implement that (as it relies on the general police power).

There is no current system of registration.

Anonymous said...

universal background checks

You mean like requiring grandpa to pay for a background check on his grandson in order to give him his old hunting rifle? That kind of universal background check?

You also mean universal background checks that would be impossible to enforce without first registering all guns? Registering? You know, that thing that precedes all gun confiscations. I wonder why some people may be against such schemes....

Larry said...

I'm wondering (still!) what these "military grade" weapons are. What military in the world buys small-bore semi-auto rifles for their troops? AR-pattern rifles happen to be the most commonly sold sporting rifle in the country and have been for years. If you want "military grade", you have to buy from the Mexican drug gangs with their arsenals of full-auto M-16s stolen or bought from the Mexican military, or smuggled in from elsewhere (and not the US).

And the marching morons wanting to ban standard-capacity magazines are equally ignorant. Except for the venerable 100+ years old Colt 1911 with it's single-stack 7-8 round magazine, the "magazine clips of high-caliber capacity" have simply been the standard for decades, except for compact-sized pistols meant for concealed carry.

"Facts" are just tools of the oppressor, though, and critical thinkers can't be bothered with such tawdry details. After all, at this point, do they really matter?