Contributors

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Polarization and Condescension

I find very little with which to disagree in Syl Jones' latest piece in the Strib. He really hit the nail squarely on the head with this one. I've been a fan of his opinion pieces for awhile but this one should be put in the hall of fame.

Major Garrett, former national correspondent for Fox News and once with CNN, has now added an additional wrinkle. Garret told MSNBC viewers that Fox thrives on polarization: "Fox actually wants to keep that polarization. ... That is an embedded part of the marketing that surrounds what happens in the news division at Fox. It's been incredibly successful."

The fact that Fox both creates and exploits polarization says a lot about today's world and those who spin it. Across America, many seem to enjoy the trauma of loose cannons firing in every direction. The folks at Fox recognized this long ago and now, when it suits them to do so, they wrap themselves in the American flag,

It's not just Fox, though. It's all of the right wing information sources especially the blogsphere. Like all bullies, they are lost without an adversary to pick on. It's how they define themselves in the world.

Of course, we know all this. So, Jones takes it a step further by bringing in the Juan Williams incident from last fall and making a most excellent point.

Williams and other black journalists have long understood that a liberal is someone who thinks he or she knows your history better than you do. A conservative doesn't know your history and doesn't care to know it.

Both sides of the political spectrum have a galling habit of trying to exploit people of color to justify their rather narrow interests.

Indeed. As many of you can probably imagine, I've experienced the liberal side of this quite a bit in the various schools I have either worked in or my children have attended. The yearly battle regarding Huck Finn is one example of this. It's white liberals, not blacks, who want to ban the book because that word makes sick.

Too bad.

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is one of the greatest American novels ever written. Being a big fan of Loewen, I have to say that the controversy surrounding this book smacks of that avoidance of laying blame that he talks about frequently. The same white liberals that want to ban Huck Finn also fall all over themselves like idiots during Black History Month. Every year, I receive astonished looks and (very fake) loud gasps when I suggest that we do away with Black History Month and integrate its content into the course of the entire year. I do it anyway and the new social studies standards for our state will as well but something tells me BHM will be around for quite some time. It actually is worse, as Jones aptly points out...

Conservative and liberal media outlets are too busy slinging mud to pause and listen to what we know so well. Privileged interests are depriving people of the right to know the truth, to earn a living wage and to make truly informed decisions about the world in which they live.

We can see that neither side is right and that both sides are wrong.

Yep.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Can I assume you disagree with this part:

NPR and Fox News are different sides of the same major media coin, one that is fundamentally bent.

I ask, because you have previously said that NPR is not liberal.

juris imprudent said...

It's not just Fox, though

Really? You talking about how bad the other guys are when it comes to polarization? Fucking really?

Funny how any accusation of liberal bias and you respond it is just media corporations looking for profit - but when it is right-wing bias, well, obviously those corporations aren't going for profit - they are going for domination.

juris imprudent said...

Ah, some more interesting reading material.

What happens when you depend on the rich for a large percentage of your tax revenue?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704604704576220491592684626.html?mod=WSJ_WSJ_US_News_6

What happens when you depend on a proven liar as your moral voice?

http://www.detnews.com/article/20110325/OPINION01/103250338/1008/OPINION01/Hypocrisy-of-Michael-Moore-thickens

What happens when you elect a man as President who has no executive experience?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/03/25/a_mission_wrapped_in_confusion_109341.html

Take heart liberals, Michelle Bachmann proves that you aren't the only idiots in the game. You can only hope that she stakes out a sizable chunk of Republican turf - you might stand a chance in such a case.

Mark Ward said...

I don't think NPR is liberal but I do think the statement is correct when taken in the context of the Williams firing and the recent resignation of two of its top people.

theirritablearchitect said...

"I don't think NPR is liberal..."

You can't say that after what happened a couple of weeks ago, Pussy, and expect to be believed.

Fucking Pussy.

Mark Ward said...

Multicultural programming and saying things you don't like (as well as the opinion of one man) does not make an entire network "liberal." But way to prove my whole bully theory, though, with the name calling. Thanks!

theirritablearchitect said...

Pussy.

And YOU ARE STILL WRONG.

NPR is run and produces nothing but liberal drivel.

Pussy.