Why is it that 30 years later it's perfectly acceptable to rip Jimmy Carter new one after new one yet, only two years after he left office, the slightest word of blame or one that is even mildly derisive of George W. Bush sends conservatives into anaphylactic fits of rage?
Just curious...
1 comment:
Carter? Hey, he's your man, if you think it's acceptable to rip him then you obviously agree with the rip.
And when one wants to be derisive of Bush, one should have valid, logical and well reasoned arguments. The 'Chimpy McBushHitler lied and people died for bloodoil' young commissariat campus slogans are a bit tiresome.
Post a Comment