I agree with Ann Coulter, who said " If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, but I don't think it's going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women.
It also makes the point, it is kind of embarrassing, the Democratic Party ought to be hanging its head in shame, that it has so much difficulty getting men to vote for it. I mean, you do see it�s the party of women and 'We�ll pay for health care and tuition and day care -- and here, what else can we give you, soccer moms?'
Really Ann Coulter fan?!?!?!... While we are at it, why don't we just make women the property and slaves of men then.Just make sure your Viagra is covered though...right?
Women are needed to reproduce just a tad bit more than the male...so you would think that men would be a bit more interested in reproductive rights to make sure their offspring survive.
Since "reproductive rights" usually seems to boil down to "someone else should pay for my contraception" and "abortion on demand", citing actual human reproduction seems just a little incongruous.
The argument about women not reproducing would mean extinction of the human race...so if that's the way you all want to go...more power to you! As for reproductive rights... I don't ask anyone to pay for my birth control nor do have I ever had an abortion... but heck...I'm the person you should want reproducing as a smart, intellectual, well educated....DEMOCRAT. Well other than than last part... for some of you.
What is it with Mark and all of his readers combined not having the reading comprehension of Zippy the Pinhead? Or is it just willful miscomprehension?
9 comments:
How's about another one: if you gots a vajayjay, stop asking us who don't to pay for it.
What's the old saying? No taxation without representation? Might be applicable here...
I agree with Ann Coulter, who said " If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, but I don't think it's going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women.
It also makes the point, it is kind of embarrassing, the Democratic Party ought to be hanging its head in shame, that it has so much difficulty getting men to vote for it. I mean, you do see it�s the party of women and 'We�ll pay for health care and tuition and day care -- and here, what else can we give you, soccer moms?'
Really Ann Coulter fan?!?!?!... While we are at it, why don't we just make women the property and slaves of men then.Just make sure your Viagra is covered though...right?
Women are needed to reproduce just a tad bit more than the male...so you would think that men would be a bit more interested in reproductive rights to make sure their offspring survive.
Since "reproductive rights" usually seems to boil down to "someone else should pay for my contraception" and "abortion on demand", citing actual human reproduction seems just a little incongruous.
Women are needed to reproduce just a tad bit more than the male...
But the argument is all about them not reproducing, isn't it?
The argument about women not reproducing would mean extinction of the human race...so if that's the way you all want to go...more power to you! As for reproductive rights... I don't ask anyone to pay for my birth control nor do have I ever had an abortion... but heck...I'm the person you should want reproducing as a smart, intellectual, well educated....DEMOCRAT. Well other than than last part... for some of you.
What is it with Mark and all of his readers combined not having the reading comprehension of Zippy the Pinhead? Or is it just willful miscomprehension?
Err, "Mark and all his 'supporters' combined". Preview is your friend.
Post a Comment