Contributors

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Some First-Hand Experiences

I'd like to expand on Mark's post because I have direct personal experience with this kind of racism. I'll be the first to say that anecdotes, like way too many surveys, are meaningless, but since Fox News relies exclusively on anecdotes to buttress every "news" story they air, I figure it's my turn.

When my fourth sister announced that she was marrying a Latino Texan my father disowned her. Then he disowned my third sister for helping her put on the wedding. I had to walk my sister down the aisle because my father refused.

There was nothing wrong with this guy. They met in the Army Reserves. They've got two kids and have been married for 20 years now. He has a decent job locating fiber optic cables buried underground.

Whites seem to have a racial predisposition to getting diseases that put them on disability...
My father approved of my second sister for years. She married a fine, upstanding, right-wing racist just like my dad. She married this kind of guy three times. And now she's been divorced three times. Oddly, it turns out that intolerant white, gun-loving, right-wing conservatives make terrible husbands. They all turned out to be bums, with any number of excuses for why they can't be bothered to work, from "my head hurts," to alcoholism, to multiple sclerosis (not that guy's fault, of course, but whites have this racial predisposition to getting diseases that always seem to put them on disability...).

My third sister's husband was the same: another gun-loving conservative alcoholic who can't keep a job. Is it just my sisters' poor taste in men, or is something wrong with white guys?

But then my second sister got in the doghouse with my dad because her oldest daughter got pregnant and married a Latino guy.

Yes, you can find racists everywhere. Yes, there are blacks who -- after having been treated like animals for centuries by white slave owners, were then harassed for another century and a half by post-bellum Southerners who falsely imprisoned them, beat them, lynched them, prevented them from voting, made them sit at the back of the bus, didn't let them use rest rooms and drinking fountains, segregated them into poverty-stricken ghettos, sent them to terrible schools, and to this day send cops into their neighborhoods to single them out for harassment on minor traffic violations and shoot them for walking in the street -- bear resentment against whites. I can't figure out why.

And, yeah, many Chinese and Filipino and Japanese and English and Irish and Norwegian American parents are opposed to their children marrying outside their ethnic group. But this is not always racism: frequently, it's tribalism.

Is it racist to fear that your culture will die out because your children marry outside your ethnic group?
It's not surprising that some Chinese parents don't want their kids marrying Anglos because they're afraid they'll stop speaking Chinese, they'll abandon Chinese customs, and their grandkids won't look like them.

Children are the only real form of immortality there is. The people some commenters say are racist may just be people who think that if their grandkids don't look like them, it will be the end of their line. Their culture -- their "kind" -- will die out. Now, I'll grant it's a silly notion -- their DNA is still there, they can still wield cultural, social and moral influence over their grandkids (as long as they don't foolishly disown them).

In fact, the entire idea of race is false: there are blood types and tissue types, not racial types. Africans can donate blood and organs to Scandinavians, and all humans can cross-fertilize (to the chagrin of the racists). "Racial" differences are minute evolutionary changes that have crept in over the last few tens of thousands of years. Race is purely a function of geography, not biology.

But the fear of losing ethnic, cultural and linguistic connections with their descendants is understandable.

More to the point, this is exactly the same thing that the Republicans are talking about when they speak of "taking back America." Why is it racist for Filipino Americans to want to perpetuate their culture and ethnic appearance, but not racist for Republicans to want to "take back America?"

When Republicans say the United States is a Christian nation, they're saying that non-Christians are unwelcome.
When Republicans say the United States is a Christian nation, they're saying that non-Christians are unwelcome (although Republicans currently favor Jews for political reasons, this has not always been the case). And since religion and ethnicity are tightly linked, it's an inherently racist proposition.

And here is the core difference between the Democratic and the Republican Parties. The Republican Party welcomes the reactionaries and racists who want to maintain racial, religious and cultural purity. They adopt political platforms to move this agenda forward and actively devise electoral strategies to garner the support of and motivate racists.

Individual Democrats might have racial and tribal prejudices, but the party does not.

Republicans these days don't make their racism explicit. They couch it in terms like "take back America," "Christian nation," "states rights," "welfare queens," and low taxes. But everyone who knows the code knows what's really going on.

Now, Republicans will welcome blacks, Latinos and Asians into their party, just as long as they toe the line and give up everything that makes them different: speak English only, adopt one of two related monotheistic religions, abandon their parent's culture, abhor the "gay lifestyle," constantly mouth Old Testament paternalisms, adopt a vindictive, suspicious and fearful mindset, watch Fox News, badmouth Obama and Obamacare, drive the right kind of car (pickup truck, Hummer or anything that gets less than 15 mpg), constantly screech for the blood of Muslims, denounce climate change as a hoax, genuflect every time St. Ronald is mentioned, etc.

For a political party that prides itself on rugged individualism, the degree of rigid uniformity required to be a Republican is staggering.
The Republican Party is not a political party: it's a conservative Christian tribe. And you have to adopt all the trappings of the tribe or you're not welcome.

Republicans defend themselves against the racism charge by pointing at Herman Cain and Bobby Jindal. But seriously, if Jindal was still a Hindu, do you think he'd be the Republican governor of Louisiana today?

In the end, tribalism is just as evil and destructive as racism.  It encourages the same sorts of violence and hatred that skin color does. Just ask the Catholics and the Protestants in Northern Ireland, or the soccer hooligans in England.

Or Cardinals and 49ers fans.

11 comments:

GuardDuck said...

Ahhh yes, more 'code words'.....


Why does N think the Democrat party is not inherently racist? If he calls it 'racist' for "for Filipino Americans to want to perpetuate their culture and ethnic appearance," but then asks why it is not similarly racist when "Republicans to want to "take back America?""

Why does not N ask the similar question of Democrats insisting upon cultural diversity? Is not insisting upon the perpetuation of diverse cultures rather than the integration of those cultures promote the exact same 'racism' that he decries?

N claims the republican party welcomes this racism while the Democratic party does not. Hogwash - the maintaining of separate cultures within one country, which N himself claims is racist, is a key foundation of the Democratic platform.

Mark Ward said...

Is this a comment containing views of yours that are relevant or not relevant?

GuardDuck said...

Is that comment of yours ignorant and evidence of your inability to read for comprehension or is it just immature and evidence of your inability to interact with others?

Mark Ward said...

Well, you've said in the past that your opinions on some of these issues are irrelevant. Why is this one relevant?

GuardDuck said...

So you are choosing ignorance due to inability to read for comprehension?

Mark Ward said...

Alright, these are words that are relevant and that you stand behind.

That stinks for you because, not surprisingly, we have a straw man again. You are purposefully misrepresenting Democrats views so you can redirect away from the GOP's obvious problem with race. You are also DARVOing again (Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender) which is another form of straw man.

Respecting cultural diversity is racist only in the mind of someone whose internal mantra is a never ending chant of "I don't wanna!"

GuardDuck said...

Straw man? One of these days you may, just by the pure odds of claiming everything is a straw man, actually utilize that term correctly. I doubt it, but if it does actually happen I will be flabbergasted.


Purposely misrepresenting? Please do tell.....

"the GOP's obvious problem with race". So obvious that it can only be explained as happening by claiming special 'code words' and 'dog whistles' are used.

Then 'Celebrating cultural diversity' is a code phrase too.

Does not the expectation of "celebrating diversity" manifest itself as a perpetuation of cultural differences? Does any part of celebrating diversity encourage integration?

I ask, because as I asked above, if N's claim that Filipino Americans wanting to perpetuate their culture and ethnic appearance is racism, how can it not be racism for ANY other culture to want to perpetuate their culture?

Or are you and N claiming that it's racist to celebrate Filipino diversity but not racist to celebrate .... some other culture's diversity?

Mark Ward said...

"pedantic, semantic arguments seem to the weapon of choice ( pun intended ) for Kevin."

And for you as well, GD:)

If you are serious about understanding cultural diversity and why it's important, I'll be happy to continue discussing the issue with you. Of course, you are going to have lose the BS first and at least attempt to be open minded.

GuardDuck said...

I doubt you are really serious Mark - you've just made an imperial declaration and dismissed everything I said out of hand.

That isn't the actions of one who wants a serious conversation.

Neither is it of one who is open minded. Who has closed their mind here? You.

Mark Ward said...

Well, I guess I have my answer:)

GuardDuck said...

You don't even seem to understand the question, how could you have possibly come up with an answer? Never mind, voices in your head or something I suppose.