Contributors

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Campaign Speak

Jonathan Chait has another great take on the momentum bluff coming from the Romney campaign.

Obama’s lead is narrow — narrow enough that the polling might well be wrong and Romney could win. But he is leading, his lead is not declining, and the widespread perception that Romney is pulling ahead is Romney’s campaign suckering the press corps with a confidence game.

A confidence game...that's right. In fact, they now say they are going to win handily! Why?

This is a bluff. Romney is carefully attempting to project an atmosphere of momentum, in the hopes of winning positive media coverage and, thus, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy.

If there's one thing that the Right have in abundance, it's hubris...and it's often very unwarranted hubris. You can always see this if one looks more closely.

If you look closely at the boasts emanating from Romney’s allies, you can detect a lot of hedging and weasel-words. Rob Portman calls Ohio a “dead heat,” which is a way of calling a race close without saying it’s tied. A Romney source tells Mike Allen that Wisconsin leans their way owing to Governor Scott Walker’s “turnout operation.” That is campaign speak for “we’re not winning, but we hope to make it up through turnout.”

Over the last week, Romney’s campaign has orchestrated a series of high-profile gambits in order to feed its momentum narrative. Last week, for instance, Romney’s campaign blared out the news that it was pulling resources out of North Carolina. The battleground was shifting! Romney on the offensive! On closer inspection, it turned out that Romney was shifting exactly one staffer. It is true that Romney leads in North Carolina, and it is probably his most favorable battleground state. But the decision to have a staffer move out of state, with a marching band and sound trucks in tow to spread the news far and wide, signals a deliberate strategy to create a narrative.

If this is all his campaign is going to be for the next two weeks, I have to say that I'm relieved. Momentum? That's it?

One other thing to note...when a campaign starts talking about another campaign "resorting to blah blah blah" because they are in trouble, it's the opposite that is actually true.

6 comments:

juris imprudent said...

it's hubris...and it's often very unwarranted hubris.

You really don't understand what the word hubris means, do you?

The shrillness (and obvious sense of panic) of your recent posts on the election indicate that you are reading that Obama isn't cruising to another term. I can't wait for the rending of garments and endless wailing that would accompany an Obama loss. You just can't find that kind of cheap melodrama any more.

rld said...

Trolling the web looking for other peoples writings that make you feel somewhat better about obamas upcoming loss?

Mark Ward said...

Upcoming loss, eh? I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that you guys are jumping on the confidence bandwagon. But now we all know what that's all about, don't we?:)

Sorry, guys, but I'm fluent in campaign speak...as well as right wing blog projecto douche.

Mark Ward said...

Oops, almost forgot...

Hubris- (noun)-overbearing pride or presumption; arrogance.

AKA...the Right

A. Noni Mouse said...

Sorry, guys, but I'm fluent in campaign speak...as well as right wing blog projecto douche.

Riiiiight. Just like I'm fluent in far eastern languages. Here. Watch this.

asdflk woeirn lwernsdk.

Impressed yet?

juris imprudent said...

Here M, this is a good example of hubris...

juris, there is no "do it again only harder" for Democrats. We've already done it and it works.

If only you could see half as well as you project.